Internal differences between mitrash and nastya. Pantry of the sun: Nastya and Mitrasha, images and characteristics. Detailed comparative characteristics of Nastya and Mitrash

Answer left Guest

Nastya, as her author describes, is kinder than Mitrasha, she is a golden hen with long legs. Mitrasha was two years younger than her sister. He is small in stature, but very dense, forehead-shaped, the back of his head is wide. He is a stubborn and strong guy. The boy's face was strewn with golden freckles, and his neat little nose looked up. Mitrasha is stubborn, but very hardworking and purposeful. The teachers at school called him "The Man in the Pouch" because at the age of ten he already did all the male work in the house. My mother died of illness, my father died in the war. And she and her sister were left orphans. Mitrasha possessed purely masculine volitional qualities and looked like his father. He learned carpentry from his father. The boy had the right tools for this. Mitrasha made various wooden utensils: barrels, bowls, tubs. He always remembered the advice of his father and they helped him.
The boy attended all the meetings, tried to understand public opinion. Mitrasha loved nature, tried to take advantage of its benefits, but when he found himself in a forest where everything is in common, he became greedy and, without noticing it, got into trouble.
The boy loved his sister Nastya very much. Imitating his father, he instructed her, taught her. But when the little sister disobeys, the "Man in the Pouch" begins to swagger and get angry. Mitrasha is a wonderful person who will be a very good and hardworking man in the future.
Nastya, on the contrary, was all in her mother. He jokingly calls her the golden hen. The thing is that all of it shone with gold. The freckles on the face were golden, the hair was the same color, only one nose was clean and looked up.
They were very smart kids. They often performed public work: they helped tankmen, worked on collective farm fields, in meadows, in stockyards. The kids had a lot of pets, but they still got along well with them.
In many ways, Nastya and Mitrasha are similar, but they also have differences. On the one hand, Nastya is prudent, because she tried to dissuade her brother from going to the swampy road. On the other hand, she acted selfishly when, in the course of a quarrel with Mitrasha, she left him and left with a cranberry basket.
The "man in the bag" was very stubborn and because of this he got into trouble, but thanks to his resourcefulness he saved himself. It was his ingenuity that helped the boy to escape: having got into the Blind spruce tree, he was able to call the dog, and she saved him. Mitrasha was very brave, it was not for nothing that everyone in the village was surprised when they found out that it was he who had shot the gray landowner. Even adults would not be able to believe that a ten-year-old boy had shot a wolf.
And the "golden hen" because of her greed, too, almost got into trouble. If she had not come to her senses, she would have been bitten by a snake. Against the backdrop of harmonious nature, against the background of various riches mastered by man, Nastya's greed is perceived as a reproach of the writer to those who deviate from the truly human. The evil that she encounters in nature makes the girl look back at herself and understand what mistake she made, succumbing first to resentment, and then to the excitement of picking berries. Anxiety, despair, fear for her brother cover the girl’s soul. It is through the perception of the surrounding nature that Nastya is fully aware of her act:
The author treats his characters very well. Mikhail Prishvin uses diminutive suffixes to describe Mitrasha. He calls him "Man in a pouch", children - "smart kids, favorites", "their clean little noses".
I liked the characters in the story, but some of their actions were not. If Mitrasha had not been so stubborn, and Nastya had not acted selfishly with him, then perhaps there would have been no technical accidents that
they got to see. But since they realized their mistakes, they can be forgiven.

She combined the real with the fabulous. It tells a fairy tale about two wonderful children who had to rely only on their own strength, because they were orphaned and now live alone. Nastya and Mitrasha are the main characters of the story, whose images we will analyze in our essay.

The image and characteristics of Mitrasha

If we dwell on the image of Mitrasha, then according to the characteristics of his teachers, it was a peasant in a bag. Mitrasha was two years younger than his sister, but he could already do most of the men's work on his own. By his nature, at less than ten years old, he looked like a real purposeful man. Thanks to the skills received from his father, the boy could carve dishes from wood, and this skill helped him a lot. Our hero was stubborn, and along with this stubbornness, his determination and hard work were manifested. However, in Prishkin's tale, according to which we are characterizing Nastya and Mitrasha, the boy's greed also manifested itself. It happened in the forest when the children went for berries. This greed nearly led to tragedy.

The image and characteristics of Nastya

Prishvin's pantry of the sun introduces us to Mitrasha's sister, Nastya. If the brother was like her father, then the girl resembled her mother in character. Nastya was only twelve, but despite this, she fully performs the master's work. Nastya took responsibility for her brother and took care of him. In the neighborhood, she is called the golden hen, as she was really cute with golden hair and freckles on her face.

Unlike her brother, the girl was cautious, shows prudence, and therefore advises going for berries along a proven path. Since they could not reach an agreement, they went their separate ways. And as it turned out, the hardworking, smart Nastya also shows greed. After all, when she saw cranberries in the swamp, she rushed to pick them up, not thinking that her brother was still gone. Meanwhile, he was drowning in a swamp. But everything ended well for the children in this story.

The fairy tale "Pantry of the Sun" by M. M. Prishvin is dedicated to real events. It describes the life of the Russian village in the post-war years. We see both the difficulties of the villagers and their extraordinary unity. The main characters of the tale were - Nastya and Mitrasha - surprisingly clean, kind and hardworking children. They soon had to feel all the hardships of a lonely orphan life. The mother of Nastya and Mitrasha died, and the father died in the war. The villagers did their best to help the children, but the brother and sister quickly learned to cope with all the work on their own. The author writes about the children: “They were very sweet. Nastya was like a golden hen on high legs. Her hair ... shone with gold, freckles all over her face were large, like golden coins ... Mitrasha was two years younger than her sister. He was only ten years old with a ponytail ... He was a stubborn and strong boy. "The little man in the pouch", smiling, called him among themselves teachers at school. After the death of her parents, the girl and her brother had to manage the entire household. The children did not complain to anyone and did not ask anyone for help. Nastya and Mitrasha from an early age learned to overcome great difficulties, and at the same time they did not at all consider their life to be something out of the ordinary. So there were circumstances that the boy and the girl had to suddenly become adults. "...Smart and friendly guys," the villagers said about them. “There was not a single house where they lived and worked as amicably as our guys lived.” After the death of her mother, Nastya remained in the house for the mistress, just like her, the girl got up before dawn and did all the hard women's work around the house. “With a twig in her hand, she drove out her beloved herd ... she kindled the stove, peeled potatoes, seasoned dinner, and so busied herself with the housework until night.” Although Mitrasha is younger than her sister, she considers herself the main breadwinner in the family. That's how his father taught him. The neighbors did not leave the orphans to the mercy of fate, they helped as best they could. But Mitrasha, "a little man in a bag", did not sit idle himself. He learned from his father how to make wooden utensils and made them at the request of fellow villagers. “But, besides cooperage, the whole male economy also lies on it,” says the author. From childhood, Mitrasha learned from his father all the wisdom that is simply necessary in the forest. The boy knows how to determine the road by a compass, knows perfectly all the features of animals and plants. This skill is now useful to the children in full. After all, they have to go hunting, as well as collect cranberries - a wonderful remedy that helps sick and weakened people. And although the children themselves lived from hand to mouth, “but when from the orphanage of evacuated Leningrad children they turned to the village for all possible help for sick children, Nastya gave them all her healing berries.” One day in the forest, brother and sister quarreled and went their separate ways. It was because of their quarrel that a real tragedy almost occurred. Mitrasha would undoubtedly have drowned in the swamp if not for his resourcefulness. The dog Travka, who, after the death of his master Antipych, was left alone, happened to be nearby. But a dog is not a person. And it is impossible for her to explain exactly how she can help a drowning child. And the little boy Mitrasha succeeded. This suggests that little Mitrasha actually possessed the observation and prudence of an adult. And he also remembered that he was obliged to protect his sister, as his father protected his mother, that he was a hunter, that he had a gun and a compass, without which Nastya alone in the forest could die. He is responsible for his sister's life. Then the boy managed to kill a huge wolf, which for a long time inspired fear in the whole district. And the villagers did not believe for a long time that the child managed to do something that even another adult could not do. But this once again proves that Mitrasha is an unusual child. He is a fully formed personality, possessing a strong character, resourcefulness and courage. “- There was a little man, ... yes, he swam away, whoever dared, he ate two: not a little man, but a hero.” He and his sister deserve the most sincere admiration - as people who can face any danger boldly.

The material for Prishvin's book "The Pantry of the Sun" was the events of the Great Patriotic War. Despite the fact that the main events of the work unfolded in the forest throughout the day, the author’s memories of a courageous and heroic past, of his native land, raised him to write this fairy tale.

Why did he choose the fairy tale as the genre for his so symbolic work? The answer to this question is simple, like everything ingenious. Exactly folk tale simply and clearly explains the truth, it is in it that the root of the search for truth and the meaning of existence lies. And it is fairy tales that always amaze with the desire for the dream of the perfection of a human being. This was the reason for the writer to follow the example that became the basis of the genre of his work.

His ideal was the flight of a dream to the high destiny of the human essence, to his duties to all that is alive on the planet.

Prishvin displays in his fairy tale a positive attitude towards the ability to realize this dream, if you quickly begin to search for its implementation in everyday existence, where ordinary people live.

In the book "Pantry of the Sun" we get acquainted with two heroes - Mitrasha and Nastya. Each of them has a number of positive and negative qualities.

Mitrasha is short, dense, he has a wide forehead and the back of his head. He is strong and stubborn despite his young years - he is younger than his sister by two years. His whole face is covered with golden freckles, and his nose is upturned. The boy's stubbornness seems to emphasize his purposefulness and diligence. At school, the teachers nicknamed him "The Man in the Pouch", because already at the age of ten he was able to perform all the male duties around the house. Parents died: mother - from illness, father - in the war. Mitrasha was very much like his father in character, possessing all the qualities of a real man. His father taught him carpentry. The boy had all the necessary tools for this business. He carved various dishes from wood, remembering his father's advice, which helped him more than once.

Mitrasha attended all meetings in an effort to understand the opinion of the public. He adored nature and tried to use its gifts, however, once in the forest, where everything was in common, he showed greed, which led him into trouble.

Mitrasha loved his sister very much. Trying to be like dad, he taught Nastya and instructed. However, when she did not obey, the boy began to get angry and swagger. He is a wonderful person, a real man, despite his young years, and a great role model.

As far as Mitrasha looked like his father, Nastya was just as much like her mother. Prishvin jokingly called her the golden hen. And for good reason: she seemed to glow with gold - golden freckles, hair of the same shade, and only her nose did not shine, but was clean, turned up to the sky.

These kids are very hardworking and smart. They performed public works: on the collective farm, in cattle yards, helping tankmen. Despite the fact that they had many pets, they coped with everything perfectly.

Nastya and Mitrasha are similar, but their characters have certain differences. Nastya's actions are prudent: she tried to convince Mitrasha not to walk on the swampy road. However, there is another side of the coin. Here we see how she behaves selfishly, quarreling with Mitrasha and leaving with a basket.

The "man in the pouch" is stubborn, which is why he got into trouble. But he is resourceful, so he was able to escape. Thanks to his ingenuity, he called the dog Grass, who saved him. Mitrasha dared, not without reason literally the whole village was amazed: after all, he shot the wolf. Not every adult could do this, and a ten-year-old boy still shot the gray landowner.

Nastya, too, thanks to her greed, almost got into trouble. If she had not come to her senses in time, she would have been bitten by a snake. The author, as if using the example of the “golden hen”, reproaches everyone who loses humanity. The girl is faced with evil, and she has to realize her mistake, because at first she succumbed to a sense of resentment, and then to greed and excitement in picking berries. Nastya was frightened for her brother, she was seized with despair and anxiety. It was because of the way she perceived nature that she was able to understand how badly she acted.

I think that this work is instructive, it is interesting to read it for both children and adults. It has a clear moral. The author seems to explain what is good and what is bad. And the fact that doing badly, you will eventually have to pay. The characters in this story are amazing. They have character, fortitude, kindness. And even if they sometimes make mistakes, they eventually realize their mistakes.