Dismissal of Natalia Poklonskaya. Natalya Poklonskaya was fired from United Russia on Putin's orders: true or not, reasons. How it all started
Political career Natalia Poklonskaya came to an end? Was she fired from United Russia after the June 19 vote against pension reform? Netizens are currently interested in the state of affairs of the former prosecutor of the Crimea, and now a deputy of the United Russia party. Internet publications have already managed to spread and propagate rumors that Putin personally fired Poklonskaya from United Russia as soon as she voted against the pension reform.
United Russia will consider the dismissal of Poklonskaya in the fall
In fact, Poklonskaya is still a member of the United Russia and a State Duma deputy. However, the fact that she, the only one from the party, voted against the pension reform on July 19 remains a fact, and her fellow party members openly disapprove of this.
The head of the United Russia faction in the State Duma, Sergei Neverov, called on Poklonskaya to surrender her deputy mandate. United Russia said that the deputy violated factional discipline and now must "make a decision for himself."
Neverov noted that Poklonskaya occupies important positions in parliament - deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Security and Anti-Corruption and head of the commission for verifying the accuracy of information about the income and property of deputies. “These positions are factional. They were offered to her by the faction,” the head of United Russia emphasized.
But Natalya Poklonskaya refused to leave voluntarily, saying that she was chosen by the voters and she works in good conscience.
“The management entrusted me with the work that I do today in good conscience, so no,” she said.
An Interfax source in United Russia said that “Poklonskaya violated the decision of the faction on a consolidated vote” and in the fall the party will decide its further fate:
“We will consider this situation at the beginning of the autumn session, since the spring session of the State Duma ends this week and scheduled meetings of the faction and the presidium of the faction are no longer expected, and it is not advisable to specially gather to discuss this issue,” the agency’s interlocutor said.
“If we talk about the work of Poklonskaya as deputy chairman of the committee, she did not particularly show herself in this field. And the commission, which she headed, met for a meeting almost a year after its formation, ”said an informed source.
Note that the State Duma Deputy Sergei Zheleznyak after voting on pension reform, he wrote a letter of resignation from the post of deputy secretary of the General Council of United Russia under pressure from the party leadership. Zheleznyak was one of the eight deputies who skipped the vote.
Poklonskaya apologized to Pushkina and Rodnina
State Duma deputy Natalya Poklonskaya apologized to her colleagues Oksana Pushkina and Irina Rodnina, who criticized her position on the bill on changes to pension legislation.
“Dear Oksana Viktorovna and Irina Konstantinovna, I'm sorry for the inconvenience you had to endure,” Poklonskaya was quoted as saying on Gazeta.ru social networks.
Recall that on July 19, State Duma deputies considered in the first reading a government bill, which, in particular, involves raising the retirement age. Poklonskaya became the only deputy who voted against the bill. The remaining United Russia deputies - 328 were in favor, eight members of the faction did not take part in the vote.
“I am convinced that pension reform is necessary. But, unfortunately, the proposed draft law contains innovations with which I do not agree and do not support them. Therefore, I am preparing amendments for the second reading and, I hope, they will be adopted and taken into account,” the deputy said after the vote.
The public was extremely surprised when Natalya Poklonskaya, a representative of the United Russia party, spoke out against her colleagues during the adoption of a bill to raise the retirement age in Russian Federation since 2019. Immediately after that, a sharp question arose in the State Duma about whether it is time for Natalya to resign, since the views of her own party are alien to her, which is still a stumbling block.
At the moment, the public is very interested in the future fate of Poklonskaya, because by her act she actually protected the people, and despite the fact that this did not bring the desired results, many appreciated her courage. But what will happen to Natalia next?
Reasons for the resignation of Natalia Poklonskaya
As everyone knows, in the Russian Federation, for several months now, there have been heated discussions on raising the retirement age, which should begin in 2019. Naturally, this news did not please the public at all, because according to the people, the government’s plans for the retirement age are not reform, but genocide, which will only lead to the fact that people will start to die before they reach retirement.
Recall that according to the preliminary plans of the government, it was decided to raise the retirement age for men by 5 years, and for women by 8, as a result of a long 15-year reform. Thus, at the expiration of the reform, men will retire at 65, and women at 63.
This reform led to the fact that people began to openly express dissatisfaction not only in the direction of the reform, but also in the direction of the government itself, demanding the resignation of the president and the current party. In order to somehow change the decision of the authorities, mass protests were held throughout the country against innovations.
But resistance from the people did not bring the desired effect, and already on July 19, the State Duma held the first hearing of the bill on raising the retirement age.
All parties were categorically against the adoption of the new law, but United Russia voted in favor, and the law was approved. The only person in United Russia who expressed dissatisfaction with the increase in the retirement age was Natalya Poklonskaya, and this is what led to rumors about her removal.
Is Poklonskaya fired now or not?
Despite the fact that Poklonskaya's act caused discontent among her colleagues, she is still an active deputy, and is officially listed in the ranks of United Russia. Many representatives of the ruling party who voted to approve the new reform are now frankly saying that Poklonskaya violated "factional discipline" and therefore must be punished.
The head of United Russia, Sergei Neverov, has already offered the official to voluntarily surrender her mandate so as not to inflate a nationwide scandal out of this situation, but Poklonskaya resolutely refused this offer. According to her, she just does her job in good faith, and sees no reason for her own resignation.
Natalya also commented on her refusal by saying that there are several points in the reform that are unacceptable to her personally, so if certain amendments are made, she can reconsider her decision. Neverov stated that further fate Poklonskaya will decide after the second reading of the bill on raising the retirement age, which should take place on the 20th of September. Until that time, Natalia will officially be in the ranks of the ruling party.
The marriage of Natalia Poklonskaya
Natalia Poklonskaya recent times is in the public eye not only because of the resignation rumors, but because of the sudden marriage. The official is always happy to talk about her position in life, but keeps her personal life a secret, so the wedding, which took place last weekend, came as a surprise to everyone.
Natalia Poklonskaya has been making a fast-paced career in the service of Russia since 2014. Having changed her oath, she became the main performer of repressions against the Crimeans. Although Russian propaganda continues to portray her as a heroine who is persecuted in mainland Ukraine for protesting against Euromaidan, and as a defender of Crimeans whose rights are being violated. This image has taken root in Russian society so much that the ruling party decided to entrust Poklonskaya with the mandate of a State Duma deputy, including her in the passage part of the list of United Russia candidates. Krym.Realii managed to find information about Natalya Poklonskaya, who has never been publicly heard before and debunks her television image.
A 36-year-old native of the Lugansk region, a former employee of the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine, played a key role in the establishment of the Kremlin regime on the peninsula. She became the personification and main executor of repressions against the Crimeans.
Prosecutor's way
In the biography that Natalya Poklonskaya submitted to her when applying for a job in the prosecutor's office of Ukraine, it is said that higher legal education she received in 2002, after which she worked for eight years, first as an assistant prosecutor of the Krasnogvardeisky district, and then in Evpatoria. In 2011, she became an employee of the Prosecutor's Office of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea for several months, and then worked for another year in the Simferopol Environmental Prosecutor's Office.
In March 2013, she left Crimea for Kyiv, where she began working as a senior prosecutor of the second department of procedural management of pre-trial investigation and support of the state prosecution of one of the main departments of the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine. This position was her last in the Ukrainian prosecutor's office.
The biography says that Natalya Poklonskaya has no awards, she is fluent in Russian and Ukrainian, German - with a dictionary.
The Crimean media first announced it in March 2014. At that time, the peninsula had already been captured by the Russian military, and the Russian-controlled authorities were actively preparing for a “referendum”
The Crimean media first announced it in March 2014. At that time, the peninsula had already been captured by the Russian military, and the Russian-controlled authorities were actively preparing for a “referendum”.
The release of Poklonskaya on the air of the state television and radio company Krym, captured by pro-Russian militants, took place immediately after March 8. The mention of this date is important, because at that moment, according to the official version, she still had nothing to do with the prosecutor’s office of Crimea and acted as an employee of the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine, who actively criticized the Euromaidan. Although, in fact, she has already called the Crimean prosecutors, convening them for a meeting at the Prosecutor's Office of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea under her leadership.
Dismissal of Poklonskaya: propaganda version
On the post-holiday air of the State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company "Crimea", Natalya Poklonskaya is presented as an active employee of the Prosecutor General's Office, an adviser to justice. Already from the second minute of the conversation, she stated: “I officially declare as an employee of the prosecutor’s office (Ukraine– KR), as a person who watched all this and saw that an anti-constitutional coup took place in Ukraine, an armed seizure of power.”
She repeated this phrase repeatedly, and as a result, she formed the basis of the popular video about "Nyash-Myash".
On the same air, Natalya Poklonskaya announced that she no longer intends to work in the Prosecutor General's Office. At the eighth minute, she says: “Without supporting the current government in Ukraine, I will no longer work in the Prosecutor General's Office. Regardless of whether I remain unemployed, I will have a job, but my conscience does not allow me to support this Nazism.
At the 17th minute, the presenter asks her a question, has she officially resigned from the Prosecutor General's Office? To which Poklonskaya replies: “Officially, I did not quit. Looks like I'm about to be fired. I understand this and I will not go back there.”
Subsequently, when she talks about this in two Russian propaganda films, the version of her dismissal from the GPU will be significantly changed and seasoned with Russian patriotism.
In the film Russian Sensations, Natalya Poklonskaya claims that in March 2014 she nevertheless wrote a letter of resignation, explaining to the leadership that she did not support the new government in Ukraine
A year later, on March 14, 2015, in the film “Russian Sensations” on the Russian NTV channel, which was filmed on the anniversary of the annexation of Crimea, Natalya Poklonskaya claims that in March 2014 she nevertheless wrote a letter of resignation, explaining to the management that she did not support the new government in Ukraine. She claims that she went to resign from the GPU with " St. George ribbon”, which she received while participating in the Anti-Maidan action. "I take this" St. George ribbon”, I hang it on the suit near my pocket and go to the Prosecutor General’s Office. Representatives of the Right Sector stood at the entrance at the turnstile. They looked at me, but for some reason did not focus their attention on me. I quarreled with an employee who said that thank God that the corrupt government was overthrown,” she says.
Poklonskaya also assures that the boss persuaded her to stay in her position, offering to start to go on vacation and rest. This can be heard at the 13th minute of the film.
She repeated the same version in the film "Crimea. The Way to the Homeland" by a Russian propagandist Andrey Kondrashov, also released in March 2015. Here, Poklonskaya claims that at the time of her arrival on the peninsula during the “Crimean Spring”, she did not yet know what she would do next. In support of these words, she cites a story about how a relative offered her to build a barn and raise chickens so that she had something to live on: “I said: okay, I will breed chickens. The main thing is that the Nazis do not come here. I didn't even know what to do." This episode plays at 1:53:34 seconds.
And here Poklonskaya names the first date of her meeting with the Russian-controlled Prime Minister of Crimea Sergei Aksenov– March 8, 2014. Immediately after that, she received access to the broadcasts of the Crimean TV channels, during which she began to actively criticize the Euromaidan.
Between the prosecutor's office and the chicken coop
But, speaking about the end of her career in the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine, Natalia Poklonskaya is silent about an important fact - she did not write a letter of resignation, but was fired for violating the oath of the Ukrainian prosecutor with the deprivation of the class rank of "counselor of justice." Crimea. Realities have a copy of the relevant order signed and. about. Prosecutor General of Ukraine Oleg Makhnitsky.
This document allows you to refute some of the facts in the propaganda version of the fate of Poklonskaya. Based on the content of the document, it becomes obvious that Poklonskaya, along with public statements that she does not know where she will work, actively mobilized the Crimean prosecutor's office to serve for the benefit of Russia. March 10, 2014 (it was a day off due to the postponement of the celebration of March 8- KR) Natalya Poklonskaya informed the legitimate and. about. prosecutor of the ARC Alexey Ugryumov that she was appointed to the position and. about. Prosecutor of the Crimea, brought this to the attention of the autonomy's city district prosecutors and stated that she would continue to organize the work of the prosecutor's office of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. To this end, in telephone conversations with the heads of structural units of the Prosecutor's Office of the ARC, she urged them to urgently arrive at the building of the Prosecutor's Office on Sevastopolskaya Street in Simferopol to participate in a meeting under her leadership," Oleg Makhnitsky's order says.
However, in the propaganda version at this time, Poklonskaya is still worried about her employment and claims that she is even ready to breed chickens.
About Euromaidan drums and "high-profile cases"
In Poklonskaya's statements about her participation in the fate of the Euromaidan, we also found some inconsistencies that indicate that she could not be a witness to what she was talking about.
For example, in both propaganda films, Poklonskaya claims that the events of the Maidan took place under the windows of the house in which she lived at that time. “The apartment where I lived ... everything happened under my windows and I saw it all, how crazy people rattled their drums, beat their shields on the ground. These fires were burning. It was the devils who got up from the ashes and danced their wild dances there, ”she claims at the fifth minute of the film.
To understand exactly where the current Russian-controlled prosecutor of Crimea and a candidate for State Duma deputies lived in Kyiv, one should again turn to her Crimean television. There she says that the apartment in which she lived in the capital is located on Rybalskaya Street.
This street is located three kilometers from the places of hostilities that took place during the Euromaidan. Visually, its location from Maidan Nezalezhnosti, Institutskaya and Grushevskogo streets, where the protests took place, can be seen on the Google map.
This place, although located in the central part of Kyiv, did not matter to the protesters, since their attention was concentrated around the administrative buildings of the authorities. Therefore, it is doubtful that at the house of Natalia Poklonskaya, one of the participants in the Euromaidan beat drums and "danced wild dances."
Also doubtful is the statement made by her in the film “Crimea. The Way to the Motherland” that she was conducting a number of high-profile cases in Kyiv against the participants of the Euromaidan. “Regarding Klitschko, who shouted at the Maidan. Now it (criminal proceedings– KR) probably forgotten a long time ago. He and the former head of the SBU had a good walk, which resulted in a corpse. I investigated this case. It didn’t work out to the end, ”says Poklonskaya at 1:52:38 seconds.
Crimea. Realities appealed to the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine for clarification. The department told us that their former employee Poklonskaya did not conduct any such cases. “Her last position in the Prosecutor General's Office did not give her the authority to open criminal proceedings and enter data into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. She had several cases that she accompanied in the courts. One of them concerned an enterprise in the Zhytomyr region, the second - an accident in Dnepropetrovsk, the third - a fatal accident on the water associated with a boat that hacked a man with propellers, ”the Prosecutor General’s Office told us.
The track record of the symbol of the "Crimean Spring"
In March 2014, the Shevchenkovsky District Court of Kyiv decided to detain Poklonskaya in order to bring her to court to choose a preventive measure in the form of detention
In Ukraine, Natalia Poklonskaya is suspected under Art. 109 part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (actions aimed at violent change or overthrow of the constitutional order or seizure of state power). Back in March 2014, the Shevchenkovsky District Court of Kyiv decided to detain her in order to bring her to court to choose a measure of restraint in the form of detention.
Later, the Prosecutor General's Office issued subpoenas in which the actions of the Russian-controlled prosecutor of Crimea are qualified under six more articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: Art. 110 part 3 (encroachment on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine, resulting in the death of people or other grave consequences), art. 255 part 1 (creation of a criminal organization), 258 (terrorist attack), art. 279 h. 2 (seizure of an airport, train station, station or transport company), Art. 341 (seizure of public buildings) and Art. 343 part 1 (interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer).
Poklonskaya is on the sanctions lists of Ukraine, the USA and Europe. At the same time, propagandists call her the most popular woman in Russia and a symbol of the Crimean Spring. After September 18, the Russian-controlled prosecutor may take a seat in the ranks of the Russian State Duma.
The MK published an article about the Crimean prosecutor, who was allegedly deprived of citizenship because of "Matilda" (actually not).
Natalya Poklonskaya published documents on the dismissal and deprivation of Russian citizenship of an employee of the Simferopol prosecutor's office on the social network. She insists that the reason for such harsh sanctions against her ex-colleague was the warning he issued to ban the showing of the Matilda trailer in the cinemas of the Crimean capital. The dismissed person, whose name Poklonskaya covered with black stripes, is Alexander Shkitov.
The story began on August 2, when the city cinemas of Simferopol received a warning. The reason for its compilation was the appeal of Poklonskaya herself with a request to ban the showing of the Matilda trailer. The text with the warning was printed on a form that lacked the registration number and the date of circulation. To understand the actions of the Simferopol department, the lawyer of the director Uchitel, Dobrynin, asked the Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika.
In his appeal, the lawyer stressed that the prosecutor's office of St. Petersburg had already assessed the trailer, and then did not reveal any offenses in it. Moreover, Shkitov's duties do not include supervision of state bodies, but specifically the Ministry of Culture, which issued a distribution certificate for the Teacher's film.
Less than a week later, on August 8, the regional prosecutor's office of the Republic of Crimea began an internal check against Shkitov and a number of unnamed employees. This was reported on the official website of the department.
Based on the results of the audit, the warnings issued by them were declared invalid, as they were drawn up in violation of procedural norms. As lawyer Dmitry Agranovsky explained to us, the maximum punishment for issuing an illegal warning is a disciplinary sanction. In addition, the lack of a registration number even to some extent facilitated the fate of Shkitov. He did not have the right to issue an official order to ban the showing of the Matilda trailer in Simferopol, ignoring the decision of the St. Petersburg prosecutor's office, which did not see anything illegal in the video.
The deputy prosecutor of Simferopol, Alexander Shkitov, was heard several times not only during his Russian career, but also when he was an employee of the Ukrainian prosecutor's office. Then he was one of the accusers of the current Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yuriy Lutsenko, who was accused of misappropriation of state property and abuse of office (under the new Ukrainian government, the charges against Lutsenko were dropped). At one of the meetings, Lutsenko even called Shkitov a "gopnik in uniform" and demanded that he be removed from the trial.
When Poklonskaya became the prosecutor of the Crimea, Shkitov took the position of her assistant for international legal cooperation. Poklonskaya said today that Alexander Shkitov moved with her to the Crimea from Kyiv and immediately got involved in the preparation of the referendum.
As a Russian prosecutor, Shkitov was also in the spotlight. He issued a warning about extremism to the Crimean Tatar journalist Lila Budzhurova. This process attracted a lot of attention from Kyiv, and Shkitov himself was included in the "black list" of Ukrainian nationalists - the base of the site "Peacemaker". By the way, he is not listed in the Ukrainian database of “traitor prosecutors”. At the same time, according to Poklonskaya, a criminal case was opened against him in Ukraine.
Also, the name of Shkitov was mentioned in connection with the publication of the historical publication “Simferopol. Whatever you say, but the truth is needed! ”, Printed by order of the Simferopol administration after Crimea became Russian. On the cartoons of the Kukryniksy, fascist symbols were replaced with Russian ones. A prosecutor's check began, for which Shkitov reported. The culprits were never found - the book was printed in Tver, everything was fine in its design layout, but the prosecutors could not establish how and who changed the pictures. The book was simply withdrawn from sale.
Natalya Poklonskaya said that the dismissed employees continue to stay in Russia, Poklonskaya herself regularly contacts them and makes every effort to "rehabilitate" them.
On Friday, September 29, Poklonskaya posted in the public domain copies of the prosecutor's warning, the notice of dismissal and the decision to invalidate the Russian passport. However, in the documents provided to her, there is only one employee, whose name she closed, and not several. Sevastopol social activist Alexander Talipov said on his page in social network that Alexander Shkitov turned out to be the same employee. In addition, he noted that two more employees of the local prosecutor's office were also fired - and for a bribe and fraud. The dismissal of Alexander Shkitov was confirmed to us in the personnel department of the Simferopol prosecutor's office, and then he himself confirmed the media.
Information about Shkitov's illegal receipt of a passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation was received by the republican prosecutor's office from the Sevastopol branch of the department on August 9. The check was carried out promptly. Two days later, his passport was declared invalid, as it was not registered in the Territory PPO database.
Shkitov does not appear on the register of persons who have changed citizenship. In the confusion in the spring of 2014, there were no full-time employees in the FMS department in Sevastopol - “seconded” ones worked. (The blank passport, which turned out to be with Shkitov, arrived precisely in Sevastopol). It was also indicated that the passport indicated the place of registration in Balaklava, where in fact Shkitov was not registered. As a result, Alexander Shkitov lost his Russian passport and citizenship (he was also deprived of Ukrainian citizenship).
The dismissed prosecutor told the Kryminform agency that he passed a special check in Russia, and there were no problems. Now he intends to challenge the dismissal decision in court ...
According to international lawyer Valery Vanin, the inspectors could have made a mistake when looking for Shkitov's passport number in the Crimea database. In 2014, there were no Crimean passports as such. Therefore, identity cards for Crimeans were brought to the peninsula from all over the country. “Judging by the number of the document that Shkitov got, it was brought to him from the Sverdlovsk region, so it is there that you need to look for information about his registration,” the lawyer said.
Now, probably, it is worth checking the passport of Natalia Poklonskaya.
PS. So, if he can prove that there is a bureaucratic mistake and he received a passport legally, he should not have problems with citizenship. And the fact that they were fired is right, because the violation of the current legislation by the Crimean prosecutor's office was extremely obvious. In principle, Poklonskaya herself let Shkitov under the monastery with her campaign, because do not ban Shkitov from showing the trailer in local cinemas (and we have not had such state intervention in the affairs of cinemas since Ukraine, when mandatory Ukrainian dubbing and subtitles appeared in the cinema) , then it would be unlikely that an inspection would begin on him and it would be unlikely that then violations related to his passport would be revealed, which are now naturally used to show presumptuous prosecutors that breaking the law is not good. Shkitov himself, I think, will not go anywhere from Crimea (I think lawyers will be able to resolve the problem with a passport), but his career in the Prosecutor's Office was actually broken. Who is to blame is a rhetorical question.
The reasons for this are quite understandable. Attempts by the state to hush up or smooth over this history have not yielded results, and soon the elections, where conflict topics will tend to be relegated to the back of public consciousness. The complacent attitude (for some reason it seems that most officials simply do not care whether Nicholas II is shown well or badly in the cinema) of the state towards what is happening, as this story develops, eventually led to the situation starting to get out of control, and with the usual exhortations already nothing could be fixed. The prerogative of the state in matters of censorship and violence was called into question. There was, so to speak, an attempt on the notorious vertical of power, and this turned out to be a much more exciting event than the tricks of the last tsar with a ballerina.
In the case of "Matilda", the command "Wet!" is now clearly given, which is clearly seen on the agenda of the federal media, where expressions in relation to Poklonskaya and Co. are no longer chosen (previously they were chosen within the framework of the existing politeness in relation to deputies from the ruling party). Prosecutor Shkitov acted as a "kamikaze" at all, since back in June the Kremlin gave the go-ahead in the style of "Don't touch Matilda." Well, Shkitov, in fact, went against the "party policy" and raked it to the fullest, acting as a kind of scapegoat, who simply did not notice in time that the domestic political situation had changed.
PS2. And yes, Poklonskaya called all the deputies of the State Duma who had already watched the Teacher's opus "Traitors of Nicholas II." So to speak, continue to raise the degree. By the end of the year, we can expect that half of the country of traitors will be typed.
I remind you that "it is best to betray Nicholas II through torrents" in order to increase the likelihood of a commercial failure of the tape (although with such advertising, it is likely that the Teacher will come out in the black for once), because with all the twists of Poklonskaya, there is one rational grain associated with the issues of state financing of various film slops through the Cinema Fund, when a narrow group of creators, having occupied the dominant heights around the Cinema Fund and the Ministry of Culture, actually participates in the development budget funds on an irrevocable basis. And here, of course, there are questions to Medinsky (in addition to Mannerheim and others), in which, with all the cries about patriotism and spirituality in the cinema, the problem only worsened. It would also be good to conduct a check there, and not only passports.
Natalya Poklonskaya was dismissed from the position of the Prosecutor of the Crimea according to the decree of the President of the Russian Federation. The main reason for the dismissal is not known to journalists. Currently, Natalia is a deputy of the State Duma of Russia. She recently got married in the Crimea. Her husband was a work colleague Ivan Solovyov.
The media wrote that the President of the Russian Federation signed a statement on the dismissal of Natalia Poklonskaya from her post. Earlier it was reported that she was the prosecutor of the Crimean region. The written decree was published on the official website of the head of state. The main reason for the dismissal was not mentioned in the document. After a while, Natalya was elected a deputy to the State Duma of the Russian Federation from the United Russia party. She was assigned to head a commission on confirming the authenticity of citizens' declarations.
After the elections, the United Russia party received about 340 seats. Natalia Poklonskaya also became one of the elected deputies. Currently, she continues to work in the State Duma of the Russian Federation. Journalists wrote that, together with Poklonskaya, Major General Markin was dismissed from his post. He did not go into politics, but went to work as deputy director of an energy holding.
Recently, the wedding of Natalia Poklonskaya took place. Journalists became aware that she married Ivan Solovyov, a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation. Her husband is the Commissioner for Human Rights in the country. The wedding was attended by colleagues of the newlyweds, as well as close relatives and friends.
The wedding took place in the Crimea without a big scale on August 13, 2018. The guests themselves claim that the wedding ceremony was very touching, and the interior of the restaurant is made modestly, but with a special taste. After the wedding, Poklonskaya did not give interviews to reporters and asked not to be disturbed on her honeymoon.
The life path of Natalia Poklonskaya
Future political figure was born on March 18, 1980 in the Lugansk region. The girl's parents were from the ordinary working class. From childhood, Natalia was instilled with the spirit of patriotism, I bring up on films from the Second World War. In the early nineties of the last century, the Poklonskaya family moved to live in the Crimea, settling in the Saki region. There she graduated from secondary school.
In Crimea, she received her higher education, graduating from the University of Internal Affairs in 2002. 4 years later, Natalia took the position of assistant prosecutor in Krasnogvardeisky district. She has held this position for a long time. In 2010, Poklonskaya remained in the same position, however, she became responsible for the district in Evpatoria. In parallel, Natalia was engaged in the disclosure of high-profile cases. These include robbery and robbery by the Bashmaki gang, collection of charges against the deputy of the Crimean Rada Ruvim Aronov. Since 2011, Poklonskaya has assumed the position of the prosecutor of Simferopol. A year later, she moved to Kyiv to work in the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine.
During the revolution in Ukraine, Natalia Poklonskaya did not stand aside. In 2014, she personally wrote a letter of resignation. Natalia told reporters that she was not a supporter of the authorities in Ukraine. The leadership of Poklonskaya refused to dismiss her and offered to take paid leave. March 11, 2014 Natalia was elected Prosecutor of the Republic of Crimea. The Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine did not recognize Poklonskaya in her position and asked to resign from the post of prosecutor.
An attempt on Poklonskaya was planned several times. Near her house, law enforcement agencies found a bag with a bomb. However, thanks to the work of operatives, the explosive was defused in time. After persecution by the Ukrainian authorities, Natalya Poklonskaya was dismissed from the post of prosecutor of the Crimea and began to run for the State Duma of Russia. She is currently in charge of the Committee for the Control of Russians' Income.
