home Calculators

Topic: “A. Pushkin. “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” Analysis of the poem. Analysis of the poem by A.S. Pushkin “I erected a monument to myself, not made by hands. How do you understand that I erected a monument to myself, not made by hands?

Sections: Literature

Goals:

Create in the students’ minds the image of A.S. Pushkin.
Consider Pushkin’s poem “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...”.
Develop comparative analysis skills.

Equipment:

texts of the poem by A.S. Pushkin’s “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” and Derzhavin’s “Monument”;
plan for comparing poems;
multimedia projector, epigraph written on the board.

Leading task: one of the students is preparing a report on the topic “The life and work of A.S. Pushkin"; Students at home should read the poem and write down unclear words and try to determine their meaning.

During the classes

“We have everything from Pushkin.” (F.M. Dostoevsky)

I. Org. moment.

1. Check students' readiness for the lesson.

2. Announcement of the topic and purpose of the lesson. (See presentation, slide No. 1-2)

3. Making notes in notebooks.

II. Working with an epigraph.

How can you comment on the epigraph to the lesson?

III. Teacher's word.

In the last lesson we told Derzhavin, who, although he lived in the 19th century for 16 years, with all the spirit of poetry belonged to XVIII century. But a man appeared who not only continued the traditions, but overturned all the canons of art, opened his eyes to Russian literature and showed all the artistic merits.

Who are we talking about?

Pushkin took up the poetic baton and made such a leap forward that Russian literature, which until recently was lagging behind in innovative searches, overtook everyone and took a leading place in world literature.

I won’t retell the poet’s biography to you, you yourself know a lot, but we will highlight some facts.

IV. Student performance . (Slides are shown at the same time, then the album is shown. See presentation, slides No. 4-10).

V. Analysis of the poem. (Each student should have the texts of poems on his desk. See Appendix 1).

The main subject of our conversation will be one of last poems“I erected a monument to myself, not made by hands...” You read it at home, what analogies did you come up with when reading it? Analogy with Derzhavin’s poem "Monument".

Let us remember what Derzhavin saw as his merit as a poet? “...That I was the first to dare in a funny Russian style // To proclaim about Felitsa’s virtues, // To talk about God in heartfelt simplicity. // And speak the truth to kings with a smile.”

1. Reading a poem by the teacher. (Before reading, students should be focused on the perception of the poetic text: “Think about what this poem is about, what is its theme?”, etc.).

What is this poem about? What's the plot? ( The plot consists of the fate of Pushkin, comprehended against the background of historical events).

2. Vocabulary work.

At home you had to write down words whose meaning you did not understand.

(Words are written on the board and their meaning is determined).

a) Alexandria Column – 1. Alexandria Column on the square in front of the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg in honor of Alexander I for his victory in the war with Napoleon. 2. Lighthouse Pharos of Alexandria - a wonder of the world, the pride of Alexander the Great. (See presentation, slide No. 11).

b) piit - poet.

c) “everything that exists” - existing.

d) Tungus - people of Eastern Siberia .

e) muse - goddess of poetry, inspiration .

3. Working with poetic text (reading the first stanza).

The poem begins with the words “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...”. What does “not made by hands” mean?

What associations arise when you hear the word “miraculous”? The Savior not made by hands is an icon, a figurative expression of Christ, which appeared not from the artist’s brush, but miraculously: Christ wiped his face with a linen, and the face of Christ was imprinted on this linen. That is, a phenomenon beyond the control of man. (See presentation slide No. 12)

What other meaning does the epithet “not made by hands” have? Sacred, sublime.

This monument rises higher than the Alexandria Pillar. What does the poet say when comparing his monument with the Pillar of Alexandria? ? The monument erected by the poet is more significant; what is created by hands is destroyed by time, a miraculous monument will stand forever.

Reading 2 stanzas.

Where will the poet's soul live after death? In poetry.

Pushkin’s poetry is not bound by any boundaries: neither state ones, like Horace’s (poetry will live as long as Rome stands), nor national ones, like Derzhavin’s (“as long as the universe will honor the Slavic race”).

To whom is Pushkin's poetry addressed? “...as long as in the sublunary world...” – to the entire sublunary world, i.e. to all humanity.

How much time is measured for Pushkin's poetry? As long as “at least one piit will be alive,” as long as people will need poetry.

Could it happen that people will no longer need poetry? What do the lyrics express? Feelings, emotions, experiences - all this is expressed in the lyrics. Every person has these qualities.

Reading 3 stanzas.

Why did Pushkin use the ancient name “Rus”, and not Russia, “language”, and not the people? Russia is a specific state with borders, the concept of “Rus” is much broader, poetry is the property of all humanity, and not of a specific people. Finns, Kalmyks - different peoples, they have different ways of life, but there is a poet in every person.

Reading 4 stanzas.

Let us remember what Derzhavin saw as the merit of the poet ? “...speak the truth to kings with a smile.”

What does Pushkin see as the purpose of a poet? To awaken good feelings with the lyre. Not to tell people what they don’t know, not to carry ready-made, even necessary knowledge, but to awaken . To show that there is something good in every person, and this is only possible through art.

What is the purpose of poetry? Helping a person become a person with a capital letter.

To fulfill this high destiny, the poet must follow the path of heroic service. This is what the fifth stanza is about.

Reading stanza 5

- “By the command of God, O muse, be obedient.” How do you understand the meaning of these words? They will obey inspiration, and not to please someone.

What should a poet be like? Brave - “not afraid of offense”; selfless - “not demanding a crown”; indifferent to praise and slander - “they accepted praise and slander indifferently”,

Let's summarize. Having literally carried out a line-by-line analysis, we tried to find out what is the main thing in the poem? The poet is looking for an answer to the question: “What is the purpose of a poet?”

VI. Working with means of artistic expression.

Such a complete understanding of a poetic work is also given to us by the means of artistic expression. What means of artistic expression are found in the poem? What role do they play?

Epithets: “not made by hands” - this word sends us to Christianity, but next to it stands the epithet “rebellious” - also a Christian concept? How to evaluate such a neighborhood? antithesis. “The soul will survive” - personification, “good feelings” - “cruel age” - epithets and antithesis.

What role do these tropes play in the poem? An ambiguous assessment of one’s own creativity, doubts tormenting the poet.

Let's re-read the first and last stanza again. “I” is who ? Poet. Why does he create? This is the command of God. The first and last stanzas came together.

Why is a monument not made by hands a creation of a higher will?

Pushkin believed that poetic talent is a gift from God, a poet is a creator, bringing people the highest rank and highest feelings: everything else is vanity and stupidity. Only then is a person an individual when he chooses his path in accordance with his destiny. Poetry is selfless service to people.

VIII. Independent work.

Compare the poems of Pushkin and Derzhavin. (The task is displayed on the projector, see slide No. 13)

(Students use the poem matching plan. See Appendix 2).

Homework.

Learn the poem by heart.

The poem “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” is notable for the fact that it was written just a few months before the tragic death of Pushkin. It is called the spiritual testament of the poet and brief analysis“I erected a monument to myself not made by hands” according to plan will help you understand why. It can be used in literature lessons in 8th grade.

Brief Analysis

History of creation- the poem was written in 1836 and published in the first posthumous collection of Pushkin’s poems in 1841. Zhukovsky made minor changes to it.

Theme of the poem- the role of the poet and his works in public life, their important purpose.

Composition- classic five-strophe. The first stanza elevates the poet above society and time, the last one speaks of his divine destiny, thus the thought develops sequentially.

Genre- Oh yeah.

Poetic size– iambic, but the rhythm is also based on anaphors.

Metaphors– “will not overgrow folk trail “.

Epithets– “a monument not made by hands,” a folk trail,” “a proud grandson.”

Inversions- “a disobedient head,” “and I will be glorious...”.

Anaphora- “that I awakened good feelings with the lyre, that in my cruel age I glorified freedom.”

History of creation

This work, on the one hand, echoes “Monument” by Gabriel Derzhavin, on the other hand, it is a response to a poem written by Delvig, Pushkin’s friend from the time of the Lyceum. A year after writing it, the poet will die from a wound received in a duel with Dantes, so it is called the spiritual testament of the “sun of Russian poetry.” It is believed that he had a presentiment of death and knew that this moment would come soon, so he outlined his views on poetry as they were at that time.

During Pushkin's lifetime, the poem was never published - it was published only in 1841, edited by Vasily Zhukovsky. It was published not in a magazine, but in a collection of poems - the first published after the death of the poet.

Subject

The main problem posed by the poet is the role of the creator and poetry in public life, how the word influences people and the resulting responsibility of the poet. Pushkin believed that a creator should be a citizen, because he can and should change the world for the better.

The lyrical hero of this work is a poet who, from the very beginning, stands not only above the people around him, but also above time itself; he is immortal thanks to the soul contained in the “cherished lyre.” Pushkin says that even after death everyone will remember him and his poems, and at the end he gives instructions to everyone who has decided to connect their lives with a changeable muse: you need to be obedient only to God, accept both praise and slander with equal indifference, and don't argue with stupid people. A very important line is “without fear of insult, without demanding a crown,” which teaches the poet not to pay attention to hostility and, most importantly, not to demand recognition of his merits.

This is the main idea of the work, the theme of which is the purpose of the poet.

Composition

The idea in the poem develops logically from the first to the last stanza, and to further highlight the last line in the stanza, Pushkin used an interesting technique: the first three lines in the stanza are written in iambic trimeter, while the fourth is written in iambic tetrameter.

First, the poet says that the creator is above his time, then the thought turns to his purpose - awakening goodness in people, glorifying freedom, showing mercy. The final, fifth stanza, instructs the “muse,” that is, those whom she visits, to be indifferent to earthly recognition or worse, to obey only God.

Genre

This is an ode filled with solemnity and high pathos, which is further emphasized by the use of various Slavicisms. The citizen poet delivers his ceremonial speech, demonstrating a strong creative and human position, which is why this genre is best suited.

Means of expression

Pushkin used a wide poetic arsenal to express his thoughts. There is only one in this work metaphor- “the folk trail will not be overgrown”, but the rest expressive means and there are many more images. So, in the work there are such stylistic figures as antithesis– “praise and slander” – and anaphora- “that I awakened good feelings with my lyre, that in my cruel age I glorified freedom”, epithets– “monument not made by hands”, “folk trail”, “proud grandson”, “cruel age”, inversions- “a disobedient head”, “and I will be glorious...”.

The fourth stanza, which is very important for understanding what role Pushkin assigned himself in Russian poetry, stands out precisely due to anaphora, while the last one stands out with the help of the address “about the muse” - in fact, the poet addresses not the muse itself, but to to those who create with its help. He shows how he sees ideal poetry - free from human weaknesses and obeying only high court, that is, God.

Poem test

Rating analysis

Average rating: 4.5. Total ratings received: 176.

Which begins with the words “I have erected a monument to myself not made by hands...”. This is truly one of the most recognizable poems of the great poet. In this article we will analyze Pushkin’s poem “I erected a monument to myself...” and talk about the history of the creation and composition of the poem.

History of creation, composition and issues

The poem “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” was written a year before Pushkin’s death, i.e. in 1836. It is the prototype of Derzhavin’s poem “Monument”. But Khodasevich believed that this poem was written in response to a poem by a fellow lyceum student, Delvig. This poem clearly shows, it is not for nothing that they believe that just as Alexander I was the ruler, Pushkin was the best poet.
If we analyze the genre of the poem “I am a monument” by Pushkin, then it is worth noting that this is an Ode. It has an epigraph. As a genre, ode was formed precisely after Pushkin’s “Monument”.

The poetic meter is iambic, the stanzas are written in quatrain. The use of Slavicisms added pathos, just characteristic of such a solemn genre. The rhythm of the work is determined not only by the poetic meter, but also by means of anaphora. When using such a tool artistic expression The stressed position of the line is highlighted.

main topic- poet and poetry, the purpose of a creative person in society. Pushkin rethinks pressing problems and sums up his appointment. The poet wants his work to be remembered for centuries, so that his monument becomes the property of humanity and culture Russian state. Pushkin is sure that poetry is immortal and eternal.

General analysis of the poem “I am a monument” by Pushkin

The first stanza indicates the significance of Pushkin’s work, namely that his monument is higher than the “Alexandria Pillar”. This is a column erected in honor of the ruler of St. Petersburg. Next comes the analogy of the poet with the prophet, where he predicts his popularity throughout Russia. In the Soviet Union, Pushkin's creative heritage was translated into many languages of fraternal peoples. In stanza IV, Pushkin evaluates his work.

He believes that he has earned people's love with his humanity and kindness of his works. He is an ardent defender of the Decembrists and revolutionaries. For these brave people, the poet is a breath of hope and a faithful teacher and mentor. Pushkin truly deserves people's love

In the last stanza, he turns to his muse, urging her to accept praise and glory without hesitation, because Pushkin considers himself a truly worthy poet of these laurels. He is like a ray of light in the dark kingdom of envious people. While reading the poem, one gets the feeling that this is a solemn ode or an ode of glorification. In conclusion, Pushkin calls people to universal forgiveness, humility, calmness, leaving all anger behind.

In this article we conducted a relatively small analysis of the poem “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” by Pushkin. This work certainly deserves our attention. We will be glad if our analysis of this poem helped you. On our website you can find many other analyzes of works, including the works of Alexander Pushkin. To do this, visit the “Blog” section on our website.

Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin is a great poet, writer, and also simply a very creative person. It is he who deserves to be respected and understood with all clarity, since in his works there is sincerity and sometimes simplicity, which is sometimes lacking in real life. Just hypocrisy and envy.

The work “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” is very unusual, if only in its meaning and content. This work is large in size, and it rhymes every line, which is very convenient. The meaning of this work is very high, and it must be understood with all its clarity, since Pushkin in this poem writes about himself, writes that not everyone understands him, and many condemn him. In this work, Pushkin tries to convey both to the common people and to higher ranks that poets are people too, that they play a very large role in the life of society, and that things are not always as easy for them as they might seem. Pushkin made this poem, which consists of only five stanzas - an ode, and also something like a hymn, which should lead people, show that poets are people, something bright like a beacon that calls for justice, kindness , and most importantly - freedom, to which the Russian spirit is very subject.

The poem entitled “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” calls for responsibility for their words and actions, especially those who are higher than ordinary peasants and ordinary people. It also proves that poets are not obliged only to please the ears of people with pleasant speech and compliments. Poets also must, simply must, guide people on the true path, showing in their works what is right and how to emerge into a pure and righteous light. That is why Pushkin proclaims that he is going not only to caress the ears of the people with a pleasant lyre, but also to restore justice.

Full analysis of the poem I erected a monument to myself, not made by hands... Pushkin

The poem “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands” was written by Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin in 1836. This is the last year of the life of the great poet and writer. So, six months after writing the poem, he died. At that time, Pushkin’s life was quite difficult; he was no longer recognized as much as in those days of his glory. Critics began to treat him more harshly. And the tsar, the tsar whom Pushkin loved, simply stopped favoring him, he forbade the publication of his most best works. Naturally, the mood of the poem is sad, and is intended to, to some extent, whitewash oneself. In addition to these problems, Pushkin was in a state of lack of money, and there was also gossip going around about his personal family life. In a word, nothing good happened in 1836.

That is why Pushkin undertook to write such a work at that moment. It was not easy, but he poured out all his feelings, desires and emotions onto paper. His poem turned out to be majestic and proud of its beauty of writing. With this poem, he seemed to sum up the final result of his work. He writes in his poem as if he were criticizing himself, but these words do not scold himself at all, but on the contrary, he tries to prove to everyone that he is not so bad, and that all his work is sincere and written from the heart.

Only because the poet understood that in the future he would become even more famous and that his descendants would understand the writer and poet, Pushkin withstood all the insults and dishonest words spoken against him. But still, despite the fact that he understood that in the future he would be understood better, Pushkin still regretted that he was not understood now. That is why the work “I have erected a monument to myself not made by hands” was written in this spirit. This is a beautiful work, written with all my heart, passionately and, most importantly, sincere. Pushkin was never a hypocrite, and he expected this, perhaps, from others. Now his state of sadness and surprise becomes even clearer.

The genre of the verse is classified by critics as ode. This work reflects on the meaning of life and about people of all kinds. Therefore, it is also classified as a philosophical type of work. The work is measured in iambic hexameter and rhymes every line. There are only five stanzas in the verse, and the very last verse is written in a solemn and majestic tone, in which a barely noticeable sadness is felt.

Analysis of the poem by Pushkin monument

Poem by A.S. Pushkin’s “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands...” sums up the poet’s work. The poet analyzes what he has done and how it will affect other people. The poem was written in last years the life of the poet in 1836.

This poem reveals important topic in the works of A.S. Pushkin - the divine calling of a poet-prophet. A poet is not just a person who puts his thoughts into rhyme. He is God's deputy on Earth, a prophet who tells people about the present, past and future. That is why the author puts himself above society, the state and the king. He raises his monument higher than the "Alexandrian Pillar". That is, the poet points out that even the victory over Napoleon in 1812 pales next to his works.

The poet says that he will always remain alive, because his soul, enclosed in lines, will remain on people’s lips. It will be called “every language that is in it.” Here the poet raises not only the question of his greatness, but also the greatness of his native country. He compares himself to her and says that as the country is great, so is he.

The poet also indicates that he is disobedient to anyone except the “command of God.” The poet does not even use metaphors; he speaks openly about his unruly head. In the lines of this work it is clear that the author is faithful only to his divine calling, and believes that his work is independent of no one.

He predicts his fate, says that his work will remain in eternity. What is most important for this poem is that A.S. Pushkin believes that it is not important how they will treat him and what they will say about his work: “Praise and slander were accepted indifferently.” And most importantly, he proclaims that there is no need to “challenge a fool.” The last lines of the work can be associated with testaments for future poets who will continue his work: “By the command of God, O muse, be obedient.” Here again the motive of submission only to divine power arises.

Analysis of the poem I erected a monument to myself, not made by hands... according to plan