How to do written parsing of a sentence. Grammatical analysis of a sentence in Russian: examples. How to Parse a Sentence

Put the accent in the word Play in the city

Description

The service allows you to conduct automatic free syntactic and morphological analysis of a sentence or text online. The service highlights the members of the sentence: subject, predicate, definition, object, circumstance, morphological information about the part of speech for this word is given above each word. When using the service, keep in mind that the parsing accuracy is currently approximately 80%, so the presented result must be carefully checked. In the comments, you can indicate the errors found, we will try to fix them :)

The letters E and Ё (two different letters), the presence of spelling and punctuation errors in the text affect the result of the analysis.

The results are stored for 7 days (save the address of the page with the analysis of your proposal).

reference Information

The concept of syntax

Syntax studies the structure of the text, the relationship between parts of speech, sentences and phrases. What exactly are the topics covered by syntax?

    Correct construction and correct composition of sentences, as well as phrases.

    Consideration of linking words within syntactic units.

    Topics related to syntactic units, their main role in the language.

    Definition of the main and secondary members of the sentence, emphasis on the grammatical basis.

If we turn to the creation of a science of syntax, we will have to delve into the 19th century. And the very prerequisites for the emergence of the term "syntax" appeared in the distant ancient world. People accepted parsing as something that could clarify a sentence and a long phrase. After a while, the syntax helped to parse not only individual parts, but also entire texts.

The concept of parsing a sentence

All our speech is built on words that we constantly collect into one sentence. In order to understand the meaning, idea and message, it is important to conduct an analysis. So, in each passage there are special components. Parsing involves the ability to find and highlight the main points in the text, while understanding exactly what each sentence is. It is divided into simple and complex. In addition, it is important to consider what type of link in the text. For example, there is an agreement, control or adjunction. Usually, for this, the main word is set, by which the meaning of the syntax is determined. Then, according to the rule, time, inclination, actors and the number of main members are determined.

Members of the sentence: subject, predicate, definition, circumstance, addition

If there were no division into certain names, then it would be impossible to understand the essence of syntax in speech at all. But, the Russian language was lucky. Everything you need to parse is here.

    Subject. The main member of the sentence, without which our speech literally does not exist. It can be both an inanimate object and an ordinary living person. The only two questions the subjects answer are "Who?" and what?". Often used as the subject of a part of speech, it is a noun or a pronoun. On the letter, it is necessary to highlight one inseparable line. See example: my cat loves milk very much. In this sentence, the subject will be the word "cat", expressed by an ordinary female noun. Or this example: he loves pizza and seafood. And here the pronoun "he" of the male will become the subject.

    Predicate. Another important member of the proposal, which must be underlined with two unbroken lines. The main question that the predicate answers is “What to do?” and "What to do?", "What?", "Who is/What is he?". As a rule, in 80% of cases the predicate is a verb, i.e. action. For example: Mom loves flowers. In this sentence, the word "loves" is a predicate, since it is an action.

    Addition. An important member in a sentence, but not the main one. On the contrary, the addition is secondary. It refers to a subject that answers the question "What?" or "Who?", put in the accusative case. Such a basis is underlined by a dotted line. Look: I am writing a letter, I am listening to a song. The word "song" will be an addition, since it is it that answers the question of the accusative case.

    Circumstance. Auxiliary part in the text, important for filling and colorful speech. It would not be this point - it would be boring, believe me. So, a circumstance is a quality, a sign that answers the question “Where?”, “Why?”, “When?”, “How?”. And here is an example arrived in time: we left for Paris. Look, it wouldn't be interesting to know that people just left. It is much more important to find out exactly where the direction was. From here we find the circumstance "to Paris", answering the question "Where?".

    Definition. In order for the speech to be colorful, multifaceted, not boring and different, it is important to include definitions. They answer the question "Which one?", "Which one?". Often in speech, the definition is expressed by an adjective, i.e. part of speech that describes the subject from and to. Look at an example: animals live in dense jungles. The word "dense" is just a definition, since it answers the question "What?" helps to more specifically imagine and understand exactly what the jungle is.

How to parse a simple and complex sentence

To make it clearer, let's take a few examples.

Parsing a simple sentence

    Alexei was awarded a medal for courage, courage and heroism shown in fierce battles during the Great Patriotic War.

First, determine the stems in the sentence: the first part is the main one, since the main predicate is present here, and the second is a subordinate clause that complements what is said at the very beginning. The structure of the sentence is affirmative, narrative. Emotionally, there is no exclamation. Considering the basics, the sentence is simple, two-part, and common. There is a complication here, which is highlighted by a comma - as you can see, the second part is clearly expressed by participial turnover.

Parsing a complex sentence

    Yesterday the English teacher did not write down homework, we as a whole class did nothing for today's lesson.

Pay attention to the sentence, it has a narrative, i.e. contains a certain fact, a mini-message. Judging by the emotional coloring, there is no exclamation. Having counted the grammatical foundations, we conclude that there are two of them. And this means that the proposal is complex. Look: in the first part, the basis of the word "the teacher did not write down", and in the second - "we did not." There are no unions here either, which means that it is unionless, but with a comma that separates two important parts.

Here is a clear example of how the parsing of two types of sentences looks like. We are taught in school in the same way, it's just that everything is forgotten over time.

Parsing Order

We are taught in different ways how to start the analysis. Someone thinks it's a priority to give general characteristics offer. Others, on the contrary, are of the opinion that it is important to define all the parts in a sentence, and only then proceed to the main characterization. It is best to put the more correct option into a small memo, so that it would be more convenient for you to use it later.

    To begin, read the original sentence carefully with a simple pencil in your hand, determining what the purpose of the statement is.

    After that, look carefully at the intonation, which is always written at the very end (question mark or exclamation point).

    Now, find the composition of the sentence by highlighting the base with a pencil. It can be either a simple or a complex sentence.

    See if there is a means of communication between the parts, i.e. unions that connect two parts.

    Are there secondary members? If so, then the proposal is considered common, i.e. includes different parts of speech.

    If possible, find the turns. They are participatory and participle.

This is how easy it is to understand what parsing is. In fact, all this is not difficult if you learn and understand the execution algorithm. Remember how in the classroom we were often “chased” and forced to do our homework for syntax every time. Having stuffed his hand, each student in a matter of minutes will analyze the proposal and present it to the class. And one more thing: never be afraid of large texts. Yes, they are equipped with huge stems, descriptions, moments and punctuation marks, but they are also colorful! We are more willing to imagine something in great detail than a dry five-word sentence. So, don't panic when you see a sentence full of basics and parts of speech. But the parsing will be cumbersome, but as open as possible.

Morphological analysis of the word

Morphological parsing of a word is understood as a complete grammatical description of a particular word form. In the course of this process, it is necessary to clearly determine which part of speech the analyzed word should be attributed to, what permanent and variable features it has, and also in which of the forms it should be used. In addition, the role of the word in a given sentence is determined.

Morphological analysis is carried out only on the words that are presented in a certain sentence. It has great importance, since the Russian language is characterized by the spread of homonymy of forms, as well as parts of speech. It is practically impossible to give a correct description of a word that appears in isolation, out of context.

The importance of morphological parsing of a word lies in the fact that grammatical categories are mastered faster, and they also become easily distinguishable in the process of practical activity.

When performing morphological analysis, you need to remember that not every word is characterized by the presence of a standard set of categories. In addition, it may be difficult to clearly identify one or another category.

Despite the fact that there are discrepancies in the field of morphological parsing of words, currently developed General requirements. First of all, you need to follow a clear algorithm. Subject to the established requirements, it is much easier to carry out the morphological analysis of a particular word. If you deviate from the rules, then this will lead to errors during the analysis, since even the wrong order of parsing will bring chaos to this process.

The actions for morphological analysis of the word are carried out in the following sequence:

    The word form of the word being analyzed is recorded - it must be indicated as it is used in the context, without undergoing any changes.

    The initial form is determined for the word. Each part of speech is characterized by individual rules for bringing words into this form. For example, a noun is characterized by the presence of the nominative case and the singular. As for the verb, the indefinite form is always used here.

    The grammatical meaning of the analyzed word is indicated as a part of speech. For example, for a noun it will be an object, and for a verb it will be an action.

    Grammar categories are defined that are invariable. Such categories are also dependent on parts of speech. If we consider a noun, then it can be proper and common noun. In addition, gender, declension, as well as animation and inanimateness are used. The verb is characterized by the presence of reflexivity, transitivity, aspect and conjugation.

    It is indicated in which of the forms the word is used in the designated context. The categories that change are determined solely by the word form.

    The syntactic role of the word in the specified sentence is determined. At the same time, this proposal is considered very carefully, since sometimes words perform those functions that are unusual for them. For example, a noun predominantly acts as a subject and an object. As for the verb, it is a predicate.

If you strictly adhere to this algorithm, then it becomes much more convenient to carry out a morphological analysis of any word. Moreover, it contributes high quality the work performed on the morphological analysis of a particular word.

Analysis of a sentence by members, or syntactic analysis of a sentence, is an obligatory part of the Russian language curriculum. Anyone who does not cope with this task should not even dream of excellent grades in the report card and / or certificate. Moreover, unlike many newfangled methods that have recently appeared in textbooks and teaching aids, our grandparents were also involved in the syntactic analysis of sentences and phrases - both in class and as homework. Yes and test papers in linguistics can not do without this task.

Surely you are familiar with him firsthand. But even the brightest students never interfere with consolidating and / or deepening their knowledge. Therefore, regardless of school performance, we suggest that you discuss in detail and remember how to parse a sentence by members correctly and without errors.

The syntactic composition of the sentence. Members of the proposal
Let's start by checking the terminology. Syntactic analysis and analysis of a sentence by members are equivalent names for the same process, which consists in analyzing the composition of a sentence and determining whether each word belongs to one or another part of speech. The difference between them is only in the amount of work: parsing involves a deeper analysis of the parameters of the sentence, and parsing by members is usually only part of the overall parsing. Nevertheless, it is precisely the analysis of the sentence by members that causes the main difficulties for the majority of schoolchildren. A possible reason: in the variability of the role of words in a sentence. The fact is that even words belonging to the same part of speech can play different roles in a sentence. Moreover, they will differ both within the framework of one and in several different proposals. Figuratively speaking, one could call each member of the sentence a certain position in which the word “works”. By moving to another place of work, that is, to another offer, it can change its position and, accordingly, perform other functions. Moreover: a member of a sentence can be not only one word, but also a phrase.

That is why many schoolchildren and even university students educational institutions sometimes they get confused and misidentify the members of the sentence. You can help them restore their understanding if you clarify the basic concepts of the syntactic composition of the sentence. You can start with simple exercises, gradually complicating the tasks and introducing new elements into them that confuse and train parsing skills. For example, to begin with, you should remember that all members of a sentence, even the shortest one, are divided into:

  1. main members of the proposal. There are only two of them: subject and predicate. Together they form the so-called grammatical basis of the sentence. Not every sentence has both main members at the same time, but one of them is always necessary.
  2. Secondary members of the sentence. There are three of them: definition, addition and circumstance. They can be present in the offer in any combinations and quantities, all together or one at a time.
Both the main and secondary members of the sentence have their own, well-defined characteristics, by which it becomes possible to identify and distinguish them from each other. Even experienced philologists sometimes argue about what function a particular word performs in a sentence, but this applies only to special cases of the author's syntax in very complex, long sentences of artistic and scientific texts. In schools, assignments are usually given on the basis of typical and illustrative examples, for the analysis of which it is only necessary to remember once the parameters that the members of the sentence determine. To successfully complete the task, only two of these parameters are enough: this is the question that each member of the sentence answers, and the part of speech that most often plays this role:
  • Subject denotes (names) the subject, object or phenomenon referred to in the sentence. Accordingly, it logically becomes the answer to the questions “Who?” and/or "What?". In most cases, the subject is a noun or pronoun, as well as a numeral in combination with a noun (for example, "many options").
  • Predicate talks about what it does or what happens to the subject. To find a predicate in a sentence, ask the question: “What does it do?” (did/will do) an object. Not surprisingly, the predicate is usually a verb. In some cases, a noun or other parts of speech can act as a predicate.
  • Definition describes the subject and reports its features, therefore answers the questions “What?” (what / what / what), “Whose?” etc. As a rule, adjectives and participles are adjectives.
  • Addition reveals the content of the sentence in connection with the subject (subject). It can answer any question of indirect cases (that is, all but the nominative): “Whom?” (“What?”), “To whom?”, (“What?”), “By whom?”, (“What?”), “From where?” etc. Additions are both gerunds and other parts of speech along with prepositions.
  • Circumstance reveals the details of the action and indicates its place, time, method and other characteristics. In a sentence, the circumstance is the member that answers the questions “Why?”, “Why?”, “When?”, “Where?”, “From where?”, “Where?” And How?". Circumstances are often nouns, adverbs, less often other parts of speech.
The very fact of the presence of certain members in the proposal allows us to talk about the division of proposals into two more categories. This may seem like a complication of academic work, but in fact, understanding this characteristic makes it easier to determine the relevance of each word in a sentence. Therefore, it is important to remember that, according to the composition of the proposal, they are divided into:
  1. Uncommon sentences - that is, having no other words than the subject and / or predicate (grammatical basis).
  2. Common sentences - that is, including, in addition to the grammatical basis, and secondary members. Their number is not important: if they are, then the offer is automatically considered common.
A sentence can be complete if both main members are present in it, or incomplete if one of them is missing and is guessed only from the context. These parameters must be indicated when parsing the sentence by members, otherwise the teacher will most likely lower the grade when checking the assignment. In addition, it is necessary to learn to distinguish between two or more grammatical bases within a single sentence. This phenomenon is not uncommon - in practice, complex (containing more than one grammatical basis) sentences are much more common than simple (including only one grammatical basis).

How to parse a proposal by members
Now let's practice practical work to consolidate the theoretical knowledge of how to parse a sentence by members. For this we need a system symbols, with the help of which different members of the sentence are marked. The traditional way is to underline words in a sentence with curly lines, depending on the syntactic role. These designations are generally recognized both in writing and in printed text, so remember them once so that you will always use them when parsing a sentence by member:

  • Subject underline with one line.
  • Predicate underlined with two lines.
  • Definition underline with a wavy line or a horizontal zigzag.
  • Addition underline with a dotted line.
  • Circumstance underline with a dotted line.
For example, let's take a task of medium complexity: a simple sentence (one grammatical basis), common and complete:

In the evening, the full moon illuminated the sky.


If you find it difficult to immediately parse the sentence by members yourself, do it with the help of step-by-step instructions:
  1. Read the sentence thoughtfully, paying attention not only to its content, but also to the form: sometimes tricky moments and complexities of analysis are hidden in it.
  2. Find the subject: in this sentence, to the question "What?" The answer is "moon". Underline it with one straight line.
  3. Find the predicate, starting from the subject: "What did the moon do?". The moon lit up (the sky). So, the predicate in that sentence: "illuminated." Underline this verb with two parallel straight lines.
  4. Find the definition (sign of the subject): "What is the moon?". The moon is full. The word "complete" is the definition, underline it with a wavy line.
  5. Find the addition: "What did the moon light up?". The moon lit up the sky. "Sky" - that addition in this sentence, underline this word with a dotted line.
  6. Find the circumstance: "When did the moon light up the sky?". The moon lit up the sky in the evening. Accordingly, "in the evening" is a definition that should be underlined with a dotted line.
  7. In the process of completing the task, write down questions that link words into a single system in meaning. Write them directly above the sentence, accompanying with arrows from one word to another. For example: The arrow from the word "moon" to the word "full" should be signed with the question "What?". The arrow from the word "illuminated" to the word "sky" should be signed with the question "what?". This makes it possible for the teacher, when checking the task, to see how you performed it, and in what sequence the analysis of the sentence developed.
Complex, incomplete sentences require even more care when parsing. Do not forget that whole phrases can be one member of a phrase sentence - and then they are underlined exactly as a single member. The same rule applies to set expressions and isolated minor members of sentences. For example, in the sentence "They returned without salty slurping" "they returned" is a grammatical basis, and "not salty slurping" is a circumstance. As for compound and complex sentences, when parsing them, the main thing is to find and not confuse each of the grammatical foundations. For the convenience of parsing and checking in writing, separate simple sentences as part of a complex one with a slash - this will show the teacher that you are fluent in parsing tools, and will certainly increase your grade. The ability to correctly parse a sentence into members comes with experience and practice, so do as many of these tasks yourself as possible, do not be afraid to make mistakes and learn from them. Good luck and great grades!

When working with various texts, many need to parse a sentence according to its composition. The implementation of such an analysis usually assumes that a person has the appropriate philological knowledge that can help in the correct analysis of the text he needs. At the same time, there are also services in the network that perform online sentence parsing operations. After a thorough study of the rules for the analysis of various proposals for the composition, I decided to present all my developments in this article.

Sentence Parsing Rules

At the beginning, I note that the expression “parsing a sentence by composition” is somewhat incorrect, since words are usually parsed by composition, and what we are interested in in this case is called “syntactic analysis of a sentence”.

At the same time, the specified parsing (in school it is also called “parsing by members”) is usually performed as follows:

  • Decide which sentence to be analyzed according to the purpose of his statement (declarative, interrogative, or has an incentive character);
  • Indicate the emotional coloring of the sentence (it is exclamatory or not exclamatory);
  • Mark the number of grammatical bases in this sentence (if the sentence is simple - then one basis, if complex - two or more);

If the sentence is simple:


Simple sentence example:

“It was an extraordinary autumn day!”

After parsing, we can see that this sentence is declarative, exclamatory, simple, two-part, complete, not complicated.

If the sentence is complex:

  • Decide on the connection in a complex sentence - allied or non-union;
  • Indicate the connection used in the sentence - intonation, subordinating, coordinating;
  • Indicate the type of complex sentence - non-union, compound, compound.

Complex sentence example:

"There were roses and lilies in the bouquet, but she liked tulips more."

After syntactic analysis of this sentence, we can see that this sentence is of a narrative nature, not exclamatory, complex, has an allied connection, compound. The first sentence here is two-part, the grammatical basis is the words “roses and lilies were”, it is common, and complicated by homogeneous subjects.

The second sentence in this complex sentence is two-part, its grammatical basis is the words “I liked tulips”, the sentence is common and not complicated.

Services for parsing proposals by composition online

Due to the richness of grammatical structures, and the complexity of creating a powerful network tool for parsing text, the services presented on the network (of which there are few) have rather weak capabilities for a full-fledged parsing of sentences. However, I would highlight the following resources:

Seosin.ru

Among the Russian-language resources for online semantic analysis (de facto, they are practically not represented), I would single out the seosin.ru service. It allows you to identify syntactic and morphological errors, demonstrates the general associativity of the text, and performs other types of analysis. Unfortunately, the service does not always work stably; dysfunctions are often observed in its work.

  1. To work with this service, go to the site seosin.ru.
  2. Enter your proposal in the appropriate box, and click on "Analyze".

Lexisrex.com

The powerful linguistic resource lexisrex.com can help English lovers in parsing. Its capabilities allow you to analyze the proposal by its members. At the same time, this site also has other auxiliary tools for performing various types of linguistic analysis online.

  1. To access this resource, please log in to lexisrex.com.
  2. Paste your proposal into the appropriate box and click on the "Analyze" button.

Forums of linguists

In syntactic parsing of a sentence online, you can turn to the help of the "human factor" and go to various forums of linguists (level gramota.turbotext.ru, rusforus.ru and analogues). Register there, ask your question, and they will definitely help you.

Conclusion

Network resources that allow analysis of proposals by composition are rather scarce, which is associated with the difficulties of creating such resources. However, there are several such tools on the web (most of them are in English) that make it easy to carry out the text analysis we need. Use the functionality of these services to parse the necessary sentences and parse them online.

    In addition to the grammatical basis (subject and predicate, or only the predicate, or only the subject), the sentence may also contain secondary members of the sentence.

    The secondary members of the proposal are

    additions,

    circumstances,

    definitions.

    A sentence in which at least one minor member is present is called common. If there are no such members of the proposal, then it will be an uncommon proposal.

    Also, offers can be complicated. They may contain homogeneous members, as well as words and various designs, which are not grammatically related to the rest of the sentence. These include, for example, appeals, introductory words and sentences, interjections.

    Complicated sentences can be participial and adverbial phrases, plug-in constructions.

    When parsing a sentence by members of a sentence, it is necessary to underline graphically all the words, depending on their syntactic role in the sentence. For example, the subject is underlined with a single line,

    predicate - two lines,

    addition - dotted,

    circumstance - a dash with a dot,

    definition - wavy line.

    The analysis of the proposal by composition is carried out in the following order.

    1. First, the main members of the sentence are marked. Namely, the predicate and the subject.
    2. Then we move on to the secondary ones. They can be definitions, additions and circumstances.
    3. Specify the type of offer (two- or one-part).
    4. Determine the completeness (complete or not).
    5. Check if it's common?
    6. Is it complicated?

    Roma took a beautiful book. The proposal is two-part, common, uncomplicated, complete

    By composition, only the word can be parsed, and the sentence is parsed by members (i.e. parsing is performed)

    To parse the proposal, you must adhere to a certain plan.

    Now let's look at a few examples of sentence parsing to make it clearer.

    If at some stage of the analysis of the proposal there are difficulties, it is necessary to learn the basic theoretical material on this topic. Below I will provide the main provisions and information that is required when parsing proposals.

    The composition of the proposal is not understood. A sentence can only be parsed by syntactic parsing. That is, we find the main sentence, the predicate and the remaining members of the sentence (additions, circumstances, adverbs, etc.). You can also define the type of subordination, if any.

    I believe that you did not mean parsing a sentence by composition, but syntactic parsing of a sentence, or otherwise parsing by members of a sentence. First you need to characterize the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or incentive. Then indicate the emotional coloring of the sentence (exclamatory or non-exclamatory). Highlight the grammatical foundations and characterize the sentence (simple or complex). Further:

    1) If the sentence is simple:

    Describe the proposal by the presence of foundations (two-part or one-part)

    Write a spread or not spread sentence by minor members

    Write a complicated or not complicated sentence with turnovers, appeal, introductory words

    Underline the parts of the sentence and draw a diagram.

    2) if the sentence is complex:

    write which connection in the sentence is allied or allied

    Indicate the means of communication (subordinating conjunction, coordinating conjunction or intonation)

    Make a conclusion which sentence (compound, compound or non-union)

    Complete the paragraphs for a simple sentence for each part of the sentence.

    Make a diagram.

    As a rule, in Russian, any sentence consists of two main members, this is the subject and the predicate, which form its basis. A sentence can also have either one subject or a predicate, and depending on this feature, they are divided into one-part (one main member in the sentence) and two-part (there is both a subject and a predicate in the sentence). When parsing a sentence, it is imperative to find its basis, that is, to identify the subject and predicate, after which, we determine the secondary members of the sentence, if any, of course. It is also necessary to identify the completeness of the proposal, indicate its type and type (one-part or two-part)

    The sentence can be parsed by syntactic parsing. In this case, in the sentence, you need to find and determine the members of the sentence (subject, predicate, definition, object and circumstance). In a sentence, there can be both all members of the sentence, and only the subject with the predicate.

    A sentence can be broken down into a subject and a predicate. From the main words of the sentence, we ask questions to other words. We identify the following parts of the sentence. See the breakdown in the table.

    Functional parts of speech, such as prepositions, are considered a member of the sentence together with the noun they refer to. And particles that refer to all words in a sentence are not a member of the sentence. Unions are not a member of a sentence if they are a link in a complex sentence. And if they refer to individual words, then they are defined as a member of the sentence with that word.

    In order to parse a sentence by composition, it is first necessary to single out its main members, namely its grammatical basis, which includes both the subject and the predicate.

    It should be noted right away that the proposal can include both all the main members, and consist of one.

    You can determine the type of sentence by the composition of the grammatical basis. Offers are two-part and one-part. In a two-part sentence, we see the composition of the subject (subject + definitions) and the composition of the predicate (predicate, addition and circumstance).

    Yellow dandelions reach for the sun. What? dandelions-subject. Dandelions. what do they do? stretch - predicate. Dandelions stretch - the grammatical basis of a two-part sentence. Stretch where? to the sun - a circumstance. What are dandelions? yellow definition.

    In a one-part sentence, there is only one main member. If this is a predicate, then there are definitely personal, indefinitely personal and impersonal sentences. If in a sentence the main member is expressed by a noun, then this is a denominative sentence. Example: Night. Cold dugout. Shootout. Silence.

    In definite personal sentences, the predicate is expressed by a present or future tense verb in the form of 1 or 2 persons or by an imperative verb, which always has the form of 2 persons singular or plural.

    Don't break the silver strings. Let's go for a walk in the park. Seek and find a life partner.

    In indefinite personal sentences, the predicate is expressed by the verb of the 3rd person of the present and future tenses or the verb of the past tense of the plural, as well as the verb of the conditional mood.

    I was awarded. Passengers were invited to board the plane. They call.

    In impersonal sentences, the predicate, first of all, is expressed by the impersonal verb (It was getting dark. doctor.), impersonal verb + infinitive (I had to wait for the train), predicative adverb + infinitive (It's bad to live without work).

    In tasks in the Russian language, words are parsed by composition, and what they do with a sentence is syntactic analysis.

    At the first stage of syntactic analysis, the main members of the sentence are found - the subject and the predicate. Then they determine the role of the remaining words that are secondary members of the sentence - additions, definitions, circumstances.

Parsing a sentence is the most frequently asked task from school, which some people fail to do. Today I will tell you how to outwit the teacher and do everything right.

Today I will give the TOP-5 services that will help you parse the sentence into parts of speech.

All of them can perform some sort of parsing of sentences or words. Each of them has some pros and cons.

These services will be specialized for both Russian and .

And I will say right away, they do not work great on their own, but they will help you cope with most of your task.

Comparison

In the tables above, I have listed the best of the best services that can help you with your sentence parsing tasks.

If you have read the table, I suggest starting to analyze each of the services and we will start from the very last line of our list and gradually reach the leader of our TOP.

#5 Lexis Res

Using this link, you can get to this service and evaluate its work yourself: http://www.lexisrex.com/English/Sentence-Study.

What is this site? For people who study English, this is just a treasure. This page allows you to parse English text. It can be used by a person with any level of knowledge.

This is a service that allows you to parse a sentence completely in English language. Sentences can be either simple, complex, complex or complex.

In addition to the fact that the site does this analysis of any kind of sentence, it also explains each word by meaning. That is, if you do not know the exact meaning of a word, then this resource is perfect for you.

You just need to write the text you need in the field or click the "Random sentences" button (i.e. "Random sentence"), and then click the "Analyse" button, and then you will get a detailed analysis of each word in the sentence: an explanation of the meaning of the word, Part of speech.

What are the advantages of this site over others? First of all, the service is very easy to use, you will not need to spend a lot of time to understand what's what.

Secondly, the site has a huge database that allows you to parse text of any complexity and subject matter.

In addition, the site has a huge functionality, it will be useful for many more of its features for people who are learning English.

  • easy-to-learn site;
  • there are practically no ads that would distract;
  • simple website interface;
  • huge functionality;
  • very good syntactic parsing.
  • if you do not have a satisfactory level of knowledge of the English language, it will be a little difficult to read all the explanations on the site;
  • words during parsing are not underlined by lines of parts of speech;
  • there is no adaptation of the site for the Russian language.

As you can see, the ratio of pluses and minuses allows you to call this site good, but not great, which is why it is in fifth place.

#4 Delph-in

In fourth place is a service called "Delph-in".

You can try it out at this link: http://erg.delph-in.net/logon . This site is a real monster for people who are learning English. This service allows you to have online access to LinGO English Resource Grammar (ERG).

It uses the Linguistic Knowledge Builder grammar development platform.

This interface allows you to enter a single sentence using the ERG system and visualize the parsing results in various forms.

I must say right away that the site is suitable for those who are quite experienced in English, but this site is simply great and necessary for such people.

What are the benefits of this service? First of all, this site has a better degree of analysis of the proposal for the method used at the University of Oslo, and to be precise, the Language Technology Group.

Now we will consider both the pros and cons of this service.

  • very flexible system of sentence parsing;
  • you can write proposals on a variety of topics;
  • An unlimited number of characters in a sentence can be used.
  • the first of them is that the service is difficult enough for people with a low and intermediate level of English to use;
  • to understand how the service works and to disassemble, to understand what's what, you need to devote a few hours to the site.

We got acquainted with the fourth position and now we will move on to the third place of our TOP.

#3 MorphologyOnline

This site is ideal for those who need to qualitatively analyze a sentence in stages, word by word, so as not to make a mistake and correctly select each part of speech for each word in the sentence being parsed.

The service is also useful in that it has a very broad description of each searched word.

What are the advantages of this service? Let's take a look at them.

First of all, it is that it is very easy to use. Its interface does not have any distracting elements, which will allow you to fully concentrate on the written information.

Also, in addition to the fact that the service indicates the part of speech of the word, it also describes the morphological analysis, which makes the analysis of the word deeper and more thorough.

This will help you never make a mistake in parsing your sentence. Also, if you want to familiarize yourself with the parts of speech in detail, you can find information on this site, which is very convenient and clearly explained.

Now let's look at the service from two sides and see both the pros and cons. Let's start on the positive side.

  • very simple - even the youngest user can handle it;
  • there are no annoying ads, which makes using the service comfortable;
  • deep Scan;
  • a huge amount of information for independent syntactic analysis of the sentence.

It is because of these minuses and pluses that the service takes only third place. Now it's time for second place.

No. 2 "Gramota.ru"

Why is this service ranked 4th? This site allows you to analyze one word at a time in all Russian dictionaries, which not only indicate the part of speech, but also explain the meaning of the searched word, synonyms, antonyms, various forms.

Here you can even find the correct stress for any Russian word.

Therefore, if you want to fully analyze the word or increase your level of knowledge of the Russian language, you can safely use this resource.

Let's take a closer look at the benefits of the site. First of all, there is a very nice interface here, everything is clear, you don’t need to look for anything. Everything you need can be seen immediately on the monitor display. The site itself has no ads.

The entire design of the site is made in simple colors, that is, from a long reading of this site, your eyes do not get so tired.

With this service, absolutely anyone can make out: from the first class to the elderly.

Since I have described all the possible pros in great detail, you can now make a whole short list and also add the negatives to see the full picture.

  • an easy-to-use site that will not take you much time;
  • nice interface;
  • no annoying ads;
  • all kinds of materials for learning the Russian language.
  • only one word at a time can be parsed;
  • the site is more geared towards general analysis words than for parsing.

We have reviewed and analyzed the second place in detail, and now we will move on to the leader of our TOP.

No. 1 "Goldlit"

Why did this particular service take the first place in our TOP? First of all, the site can parse the sentence, regardless of the number of characters and words.

The analysis on the site is built very conveniently. The service was created specifically for parsing sentences.

This site has a number of benefits. As mentioned, the site can analyze entire sentences, and not just by the word.

Syntactic analysis is carried out very conveniently: first, the initial forms of the word are written, then the parts of speech, then the grammatical analysis comes, and then the declension by cases.

Of all the TOP, this service has the most convenient and eye-pleasing interface.

In addition to these advantages, the site also has sections with various literature. different periods, various poetry, both Russian and foreign. The site has information about many poets, many conveniently written biographies. All this will also help you to study various literature, if you need it.

But despite all these advantages, the site also has some disadvantages. We will talk about them after we have compared all the virtues.

  • performs a complete analysis of the sentence, regardless of the subject, number of words and symbols;
  • the minimum amount of advertising, but even it does not interfere with the use of the site;
  • very easy to learn;
  • a lot of information on literature;
  • beautiful interface and good colors.
  • the absolute absence of materials on the Russian language;
  • the site is geared towards literature more, but still has a tool for parsing sentences.

Outcome

Let's sum up. After analyzing the whole TOP, you can understand that if you need a site for parsing sentences in Russian, I recommend you use the Goldlit resource.

The simplicity of the site, excellent analysis of the offer, a lot of interesting materials - these are the key factors that influenced the location of the site in our top.

It is the absolute leader in our TOP and the best online service for parsing sentences in Russian in Russian Internet networks.

This is a resource that will help you not only do your homework, but also get acquainted with various literature. Use the "Goldlit" service.