“As the new government is depicted in the poem “Anna Snegina”. Essay “How the new power is depicted in the poem “Anna Snegina” Anna Snegina how the new power of the soviets is depicted
Fragrant bird cherry. Epithet. Levitan. Monument to S. Yesenin. Speech warm-up. State Museum-Reserve. Thrift. A. Shevelev. Rules for expressive reading. White birch. Vocabulary work. Born in the Ryazan province. Yesenin's creativity. Sergey Yesenin. The bird cherry blossomed. Life of Sergei Yesenin. Rural primary school. Metaphor. Personification. Put the emphasis correctly. Big things can be seen from a distance.
“Poem “Porosh”” - Winter fairy-tale landscape. The poem "Porosh". Physical exercise. Arrange words that indicate the movement of snow. Alliteration. Sergei Alexandrovich Yesenin 1895-1925. Be healthy. Movement helps convey words. LH feels nature. Native nature in poems of 20th century poets. Warm up. The slow fall of snow creates a fabulous picture. Why are crows gray? Riddles that the poet thought about as a child.
“Poem “Anna Snegina”” - Lydia Kashina. Epigraph for the lesson. Which hero's speech opens the poem? Behind the mountains, behind the yellow valleys. Anna Sardanovskaya. Conversation on issues. Autobiographical character of the image main character. How does the lyrical hero see the past? What are the moods of the poet’s fellow countrymen? Moral and philosophical sound of the poem “Anna Snegina”. Statements about Yesenin. How do the author and lyrical hero. A traditional theme for Russian literature.
“Do not wander, do not crush in the crimson bushes” - Conversation on issues. Preliminary task. Image of nature. “Don’t wander, don’t wander in the crimson bushes...” Let the blue evening whisper to me sometimes. Reading a poem. Words for color. Vocabulary work. The impression of perfection. Alliteration. The subtle name melted away like a sound. What mood is in the poem? Epithet.
“Yesenin “Wood Romance”” - Poplar. Spruce. Kalina. Religion of thought. Willow. Sergei Yesenin “Wood Romance”. Oak. Birch. Linden. Tree. Traditional trope. Rowan. Maple. Apple tree.
“Yesenin “Cheryomukha”” - White birch. The stream is singing. Poems about nature. The first book of poems by Sergei Yesenin. Sergei Alexandrovich Yesenin. S. Yesenin. Speech warm-up. Poem. Read expressively. Familiarize students with the biography of S. Yesenin. Bird cherry. Physical education minute. A dilapidated hut.
The theme of revolution in S. Yesenin’s poem “Anna Snegina”
Literature and library science
Yesenina Anna Snegina. The poem Anna Onegina, written shortly before the poet’s death in 1924, was a kind of generalization of Yesenin’s thoughts about this dramatic and controversial time and absorbed many of the motifs and images of his lyrics. This feeling is intensified in the poem by the fact that on its pages, as the personification of his youth, Anna Snegina’s first love appears, a girl in a white cape who affectionately said: No, despite past memories, the author understands perfectly well that it is impossible to return the past:...
5. The theme of revolution in S. Yesenin’s poem “Anna Snegina”.
The poem "Anna Onegin", written shortly before the poet's death in 1924, was a kind of generalization of Yesenin's thoughts about this dramatic and controversial time and absorbed many of the motifs and images of his lyrics. “Epic” events are revealed through fate, consciousness, and feelings of the poet and the main character. The title itself suggests that in the center is the fate of a person, a woman, against the backdrop of the historical collapse of old Russia. The heroine's name sounds poetic and polysemantic. Snegina a symbol of the purity of white snow echoes the spring flowering of bird cherry, white as snow, and denotes, according to Yesenin, a symbol of youth lost forever. In addition, this poetry looks like an obvious dissonance against the background of time.
The theme of time and the theme of the homeland are closely connected in the poem. The action begins on Ryazan soil in 1917 and ends in 1923. Behind the fate of one of the corners of the Russian land is the fate of the country and the people. Changes in the life of the village, in the appearance of the Russian peasant, begin to be revealed from the first lines of the poem.
The main theme of the poem is October in the village. Yesenin simply could not help but touch upon this topic in his work. He, like Mayakovsky, came to poetry not out of a whim of vanity, but was mobilized and called upon by the revolution. The peasant question, the most painful and most difficult issue of our Russian history, worried the poet most of all, and he touches on it in his poem, which reflects Yesenin’s impressions of trips to his native village of Konstantinovo in the summer months of one thousand nine hundred and eighteen. The poet’s older sister recalls: “God knows what was going on in our village. “Down with the bourgeoisie!” Down with the landowners! - rushing from all sides. Every week the men gathered for a gathering. Everything was led by Pyotr Yakovlevich Mochalin, our fellow villager, a worker at the Kolomna plant. During the revolution, he enjoyed great authority in our village. Mochalin’s personality interested Sergei. He knew everything about him. Later, Mochalin served him to a certain extent as a prototype for the image of Ogloblin Pron in Anna Snegina.
The fates of the main characters of the poem are closely connected with the events taking place at this time in the village: the landowner Anna Snegina, whose entire farm is taken by the peasants to the volost, the poor peasant Ogloblin Pron, who is fighting for the power of the Soviets and dreams of quickly establishing a commune in his village, an old miller, a poet-storyteller, drawn into “peasant affairs” by the revolutionary storm. The attitude of the author of the poem towards his characters is imbued with lyrical sincerity and concern for their destinies. It is customary to talk about “Anna Snegina” as a lyrical poem, but it is quite obvious that the source of its artistic power is not only in the deepest lyricism, but also in the epic scale of the events depicted. In nineteen twenty-five, Yesenin repeatedly reads “Anna Snegina.” Furmanov, who was present at one of these readings, recalls: “He read us his last, dying poem. We greedily swallowed the aromatic, fresh, strong, charm of Yesenin’s verse, we squeezed each other’s hands, pushed each other in places where we no longer had the strength to hold the joy inside.”
The entire poem is written in an elegiac-sad tone. It is composed of episodes that give a holistic view of the events taking place. This poem is a poem of characters. In the first place is the image of the narrator himself. Through him, the epic construction of the work is painted with lyrical colors, sometimes light, sometimes dark. The lyrical hero appears in the poem both as a narrator and as a participant in everything that happens in it. The poet recalls his irretrievably lost youth, his first, selfless love. He arrives in a village where everything, from the surrounding landscape to the hut and the gate, reminds him of the past. The development of the plot begins in the first part of the poem: the hero returns to his native place after a three-year absence. The February revolution has happened, but the war continues. The poet wants to relax, communicate with nature, remember his youth and stay away from the impending terrible events. But they themselves, unbidden, burst into his life. He had just returned from the war, threw down his rifle and “decided to fight in verse.”
Unlike his first works, which glorify the transformed peasant Rus' as a single whole, in “Anna Snegina” the poet shows different “men”: peasant workers, especially the rural poor, warmly welcome Soviet power; There are among them those who, according to Pron’s deep conviction, “still need to be cooked”; there are also inveterate owners, like the driver; There are loudmouths and slackers, like Labutya, who are looking for an “easy life” in the revolution. We see that greed and lack of self-esteem are equally characteristic of peasants, as are hard work and piety. But the characters of men are manifested not only in some actions, but also in the intonations of speech. Everyone has their own. The driver's story cannot be confused with any other.
The Radov men who dream of receiving landowners' lands without ransom have their own intonation characteristics. How contrastingly the Ogloblin brothers are depicted: Pron and Labutya. If the first is a genuine exponent of peasant aspirations, direct and open, then the second is a lazy man, a drunkard, a coward and an opportunist.
The author understands the changes that are taking place in the village, and feels that he himself is also changing. This feeling is intensified in the poem by the fact that on its pages, as the personification of his youth, appears Anna Snegina first love, “a girl in a white cape,” who affectionately said: “No!” Despite past memories, the author understands perfectly well that it is impossible to return the past: the world around him has changed, and he himself has changed. Anna is married and, of course, is no longer the woman the poet loved at sixteen. The present Anna does not arouse any interest in the author, but is only a reason for memories of the past. They have nothing in common except these memories. Anna, who once dreamed of fame together with the young poet, is knocked out of the usual way of life of the landowner by the revolution.
Life breaks the ideas of the heroes that were formed in their youth; former ideals and lofty, unrealizable dreams are gradually lost. However, despite the loss of what was so dear in his youth, the author affirms the idea that youth and everything connected with it is beautiful and valuable in itself. The poet realizes that losses are inevitable, but hopes that they will be replaced by something new, better. Snegina’s letter from London again reminds the author of “eternal values”, of his youth, and he concludes (following Pushkin) that love is amazing and beautiful, regardless of whether it was happy or not.
The poem “Anna Snegina” is a rare document of the revolutionary era. There is no one and nothing to challenge this document. None of the poets of those years left us such a canvas about the life of the Russian peasant in the days of the great social turning point. It would seem that everything that Yesenin talks about in this and in his other works, he talks about himself. But this deeply concerns each of us today. As if from his twenties the poet invisibly stepped towards us, into the present, and continues to step further into the future...
In the new Russia there is no place left for beauty, just as there has long been no place for Radov’s paradise. The country turned into beggars Kriushi. By the way, in Yesenin’s native Konstantinovsky district, villages with such names existed, but they were not located next to each other. Obviously, Yesenin was attracted by the symbolic meaning of these names. “Radovo” in our minds is associated with “joy”, as well as with “delight”, that is, taking care of something. “Kriushi” reminds us of something wrong, crooked. Yesenin, back in August 1920, noted with alarm in one of his letters: “...What is happening is not the kind of socialism that I thought about, but definite and deliberate, like some island of Helena, without glory and without dreams. It’s cramped in it for the living, cramped in building a bridge to the invisible world, for these bridges are being cut down and blown up from under the feet of future generations.” The poet most likely foresaw that the Soviet government, unlike the tsarist government, would not be satisfied with an extra measure of flour and millet, but, having achieved strength, would be able to squeeze all the juices out of the peasants (this is what happened during collectivization, after Yesenin’s suicide). That is why, like the heroine of the poem, he looked at the red flag not only with joy (Yesenin welcomed the revolution that gave land to the peasants), but also with ever-increasing fear.
The image of Anna Snegina herself is also interesting, she is part of the lyrical hero’s past, his youth. The poet recalls his youth, when he and Anna dreamed of a wonderful future and talked about their capabilities and aspirations. But now everything has changed, life itself has changed, regardless of the will of people. The episode where Anna Snegina learns about the death of her husband in the war is tragic. The theme of personal fate is inextricably linked in the poem with the theme small homeland and with the theme of Russia in general.
As well as other works that may interest you |
|||
| 32895. | The problem of cognition. Stages of knowledge: sensory and rational, empirical and theoretical. Sensualism and rationalism. The problem of truth. Agnosticism | 44.86 KB | |
| The problem of cognition. Stages of knowledge: sensory and rational, empirical and theoretical. The subject of knowledge is the one who knows; The object of knowledge is what is known. Sensory cognition The simplest and most basic form of cognition. | |||
| 32896. | Consciousness and man. Hylozoism, panpsychism. Reductionism, physicalism, mechanism | 35.52 KB | |
| Hylozoism is the doctrine of the universal animation of matter. Denies the boundary between living and nonliving and considers life an integral property of matter. Reductionism - higher forms of matter can be fully explained on the basis of the laws inherent in lower forms, i.e. Mechanism - a theory according to which all phenomena are completely explainable on the basis of mechanical principles; the idea that every phenomenon is the result of the existence of matter in motion and can be explained on the basis of laws... | |||
| 32897. | Descartes (1596-1650) | 11.6 KB | |
| The first rule of the method states that everything that is perceived in a clear and distinct form and does not give rise to doubt is true, that is, it is self-evident. The second rule of the method suggests dividing each complex thing into simpler components for the sake of success in studying it. The third rule of the method states: in cognition by thought one should move from the simplest, that is, the elementary and most accessible things to us, to more complex things. The fourth rule of the Cartesian method focuses on achieving completeness of knowledge. | |||
| 32899. | Immanuel Kant(1724 – 1804) | 12.28 KB | |
| Immanuel Kant1724 1804. In Kant's philosophical development, two periods are distinguished: 1. Development of a cosmogonic picture of the world origin solar system from the original nebula the theory of Kant-Laplace. General Natural History and Theory of Heaven 1755 In it, Kant practically excludes the idea of creation. | |||
| 32900. | NEO-KANTIANITY | 11.82 KB | |
| In neo-Kantianism, a distinction is made between the Marburg School, which dealt primarily with the logical and methodological problems of the natural sciences, and the Freiburg Baden School, which focused on the problems of values and methodology of the sciences of the humanities. She developed mainly issues related to the methodology of the humanities. The representatives of this school saw the difference between natural science and the sciences of the humanities not in the difference in the subject of research, but in the specific method inherent in historical knowledge. | |||
| 32901. | Philosophical system | 11.94 KB | |
| The subjective spirit of human consciousness, comprehending things, discovers in them the manifestation of the absolute spirit of divine thinking. Nature generated by the spirit does not have an existence independent of it. The spirit emerges from nature, interrupting the outer crust of materiality as something lower.3 The philosophy of spirit is divided into three parts into the teachings of the subjective, objective and absolute spirit. | |||
| 32902. | The formation of Marxist philosophy | 11.5 KB | |
| In the second half of the 50s and especially in the 60s, an anthropological turn took place: Soviet philosophy turned to man and human problems. In modern bourgeois society, according to Marx, it appeared as a problem of alienation: the structure of society, division of labor, private property, is such that the results of human activity, the products of labor, are alienated from man and transformed into a force dominating him, which leads to the alienation of people from each other. | |||
| 32903. | Philosophy of Life in the 19th century | 12.41 KB | |
| Philosophy of Life in the 19th century. In the mid-19th century, an evolutionary concept of life was created. It was at this time that irrationalism emerged, which by the end of the 19th century was formalized into a separate school, the Philosophy of Life. This integral flow of life is inexplicable within the framework of rationalism, positivism, mechanism, etc. | |||
1 slide
Poem by Sergei Aleksandrovich Yesenin “Anna Snegina” Goal: to see that “Anna Snegina” is one of outstanding works Russian literature
2 slide
Let's figure out everything that we saw, What happened, what happened in the country, And we will forgive where we were bitterly offended Through someone else's and our fault. S. Yesenin The poem “Anna Snegina” was completed by S. Yesenin in January 1925. This poem intertwines all the main themes of Yesenin’s lyrics: Motherland, love, “Leaving Rus',” “Soviet Rus'.” The poet himself defined his work as a lyric-epic poem.
3 slide
Vocabulary work A lyroepic work is a work that combines an epic and lyrical depiction of life. In this work, the poetic narrative about the actions and experiences of the characters is often interrupted by the author’s digressions, sometimes leading away from the theme of the work. Leitmotif - the main recurring motif, the main theme.
4 slide
He considered it the best work of all that had been written previously. What traditional theme for Russian literature is developed in the poem?
5 slide
The theme of the extinction of “noble nests”, begun by I.S. Turgenev in “The Noble Nest”, developed by A.P. Chekhov in “The Cherry Orchard”, received a different meaning from Yesenin; one might say, he put an end to the development of this theme: with the advent of Under Soviet rule, the “nests of the nobility” disappeared. Yesenin subtly noticed in the poem with what beautiful ease the nobles parted with material values.
6 slide
The heroine of the poem, an aristocrat by birth, steadfastly and calmly experiences the revolutionary retribution of the peasants and the ruin of her farm, but painfully perceives the fate of Russia, her outcast, and parting with Yesenin. There is no hatred in her soul, but she retains a romantic feeling for the hero, who becomes not only the image of her love, but also the image of the Motherland.
7 slide
8 slide
We've been in trouble ever since. The reins slipped from happiness. For almost three years in a row we have either had a death or a fire.
Slide 9
10 slide
What is your attitude towards war? Why does the hero return from the war without permission?
11 slide
12 slide
What questions do men care about? How are the feelings of the characters, Anna and Sergei, shown when they meet?
Slide 13
Physical exercise 1. I.P. standing, hands on the belt. Raise your shoulders up, down. 6 times 2. I.p. standing, arms bent at the elbows. Raising and closing hands. 6 times 3. I.p. sitting. Flexion and extension of fingers and toes at the same time. 10 times 4. I.p. sitting. Various pats on knees and hands. 10 times 5. Focus on the neighbor sitting in front, look at the board (an exercise for the eyes and attention). 3 times
Slide 14
What is the reason for the discord in the relationship between heroes and heroines? How is the new government portrayed in the poem?
15 slide
Let us remember what the hero answered to the men’s question about Lenin. What events take place before the hero’s next visit to his native place?
Let's figure out everything that we saw Let's figure out everything that we saw What happened, what happened in the country, What happened, what happened in the country, And we will forgive where we were bitterly offended And we will forgive where we were bitterly offended Through someone else's and through our fault. Through someone else's and our fault. S. Yesenin S. Yesenin The poem “Anna Snegina” was completed by S. Yesenin in January 1925. This poem intertwines all the main themes of Yesenin’s lyrics: Motherland, love, “Leaving Rus',” “Soviet Rus'.” The poet himself defined his work as a lyric-epic poem. The poem “Anna Snegina” was completed by S. Yesenin in January 1925. This poem intertwines all the main themes of Yesenin’s lyrics: Motherland, love, “Leaving Rus',” “Soviet Rus'.” The poet himself defined his work as a lyric-epic poem.
Vocabulary work Vocabulary work A lyroepic work is a work that combines an epic and lyrical depiction of life. In this work, the poetic narrative about the actions and experiences of the characters is often interrupted by the author’s digressions, sometimes leading away from the theme of the work. A lyric epic work is a work that combines an epic and lyrical depiction of life. In this work, the poetic narrative about the actions and experiences of the characters is often interrupted by the author’s digressions, sometimes leading away from the theme of the work. Leitmotif - the main recurring motif, the main theme. Leitmotif - the main recurring motif, the main theme.
He considered it the best work of all that had been written previously. He considered it the best work of all that had been written previously. What traditional theme for Russian literature is developed in the poem? What traditional theme for Russian literature is developed in the poem?
The theme of the extinction of “noble nests”, begun by I.S. Turgenev in “The Noble Nest”, developed by A.P. Chekhov in “The Cherry Orchard”, received a different meaning from Yesenin; one might say, he put an end to the development of this theme: with the advent of Under Soviet rule, the “nests of the nobility” disappeared. The theme of the extinction of “noble nests”, begun by I.S. Turgenev in “The Noble Nest”, developed by A.P. Chekhov in “The Cherry Orchard”, received a different meaning from Yesenin; one might say, he put an end to the development of this theme: with the advent of Under Soviet rule, the “nests of the nobility” disappeared. Yesenin subtly noticed in the poem with what beautiful ease the nobles parted with material values. Yesenin subtly noticed in the poem with what beautiful ease the nobles parted with material values.
The heroine of the poem, an aristocrat by birth, steadfastly and calmly experiences the revolutionary retribution of the peasants and the ruin of her farm, but painfully perceives the fate of Russia, her outcast, and parting with Yesenin. The heroine of the poem, an aristocrat by birth, steadfastly and calmly experiences the revolutionary retribution of the peasants and the ruin of her farm, but painfully perceives the fate of Russia, her outcast, and parting with Yesenin. There is no hatred in her soul, but she retains a romantic feeling for the hero, who becomes not only the image of her love, but also the image of the Motherland. There is no hatred in her soul, but she retains a romantic feeling for the hero, who becomes not only the image of her love, but also the image of the Motherland.
Fizminutka Fizminutka 1. I.P. standing, hands on the belt. Raise your shoulders up, down. 6 times 1. I.P. standing, hands on the belt. Raise your shoulders up, down. 6 times 2. I.p. standing, arms bent at the elbows. Raising and closing hands. 6 times 2. I.p. standing, arms bent at the elbows. Raising and closing hands. 6 times 3. I.p. sitting. Flexion and extension of fingers and toes at the same time. 10 times 3. I.p. sitting. Flexion and extension of fingers and toes at the same time. 10 times 4. I.p. sitting. Various pats on knees and hands. 10 times 4. I.p. sitting. Various pats on knees and hands. 10 times 5. Focus on the neighbor sitting in front, turn your gaze to the board (an exercise for the eyes and attention). 3 times 5. Focus on the neighbor sitting in front, turn your gaze to the board (an exercise for the eyes and attention). 3 times
And again the “second plan”, the deep one, appears. The hero seems not to be affected by the letter, as if he is doing everything as before, but everything seems different to him. And again the “second plan”, the deep one, appears. The hero seems not to be affected by the letter, as if he is doing everything as before, but everything seems different to him.
I walk through an overgrown garden, I walk through an overgrown garden, Lilac touches my face. The face is touched by lilac. So dear to my flashing glances So dear to my flashing glances The hunched fence. A hunched fence. Let's compare with the description (almost the same) from the 1st chapter. Let's compare with the description (almost the same) from the 1st chapter. What changed? What changed?
At the end of the poem, only one word has been changed, but the meaning has changed significantly: At the end of the poem, only one word has been changed, but the meaning has changed significantly: We all loved in these years, We all loved in these years, But, that means, But, that means, They loved us too. They loved us too. These are all words of the same series: nature, homeland, spring, love. And the one who forgave is right (read the epigraph). These are all words of the same series: nature, homeland, spring, love. And the one who forgave is right (read the epigraph).
The purpose of the lesson: show that “Anna Snegina” is one of the outstanding works of Russian literature; teach art analysis works;
show the nationality of S.A. Yesenin’s creativity.
Methodical techniques: lecture with elements of conversation; analytical reading.
Let's figure out everything we saw
What happened, what happened in the country,
And we will forgive where we were bitterly offended
Through someone else's and our fault.
During the classes.
I. introduction teachers. State the topic and purpose of the lesson. (slides 2, 3)
II. Checking remote control. (test, slides 4, 5)
IV. Vocabulary work. (slide 6)
V. Introduction.
1. The teacher's word.
The poem “Anna Snegina” was completed by Yesenin in January 1925. This poem intertwines all the main themes of Yesenin’s lyrics: homeland, love, “Leaving Rus'” and “Soviet Rus'”. The poet himself defined his work as a lyric-epic poem. He considered it the best work of all written earlier.
2. Student message.
The main part of the poem reproduces the events of 1917 on Ryazan land. The fifth chapter contains a sketch of rural post-revolutionary Rus' - the action in the poem ends in 1923. The poem is autobiographical, based on memories of youthful love. But the personal fate of the hero is understood in connection with the fate of the people. In the image of the hero - the poet Sergei - we guess Yesenin himself. The prototype of Anna is L.I. Kashina, who, however, did not leave Russia. In 1917, she handed over her house in Konstantinov to the peasants, and she herself lived in an estate on White Yar on the Oka River. Yesenin was there. In 1918 she moved to Moscow and worked as a typist. Yesenin met with her in Moscow. But a prototype and an artistic image are different things, and they are bad. the image is always richer.
3. The teacher's word. (slides 7, 8, 9)
The events in the poem are presented sketchily, and what is important to us is not the events themselves, but the author’s attitude towards them. Yesenin's poem is both about time and about what remains unchanged at all times. The plot of the poem is the story of the failed fate of the heroes against the background of a bloody and uncompromising class struggle. In the course of the analysis, we will trace how the leading motif of the poem develops, closely related to the main themes: the theme of condemnation of the war and the theme of the peasantry. The poem is lyric-epic. At the core lyrical plan of the poem lies the fate of the main characters - Anna Snegina and the Poet. At the core epic plan - the theme of condemnation of the war and the theme of the peasantry.
VI. Analytical conversation.
- Which hero’s speech opens the poem? What is he talking about? (The poem begins with the story of a driver who is taking the hero returning from the war to his native place. From his words we learn “sad news” about what is happening in the rear: residents of the once rich village of Radova are at enmity with their neighbors - the poor and thieving Kriushans. This enmity led to a scandal and the murder of the headman and to the gradual ruin of Radov:
We've been in trouble ever since.
The reins rolled off happiness.
Almost three years in a row
We either have a death or a fire.)
- What do the lyrical hero and the author have in common? Can they be identified?
(Although the lyrical hero bears the name Sergei Yesenin, he cannot be completely identified with the author. The hero, in the recent past a peasant of the village of Radova, and now a famous poet, deserted from Kerensky’s army and has now returned to his native place, of course, has a lot in common with the author and, first of all, in the structure of thoughts, in moods, in relation to the events and people described.)
THE THEME OF WAR.
- What is your attitude towards the war? (Military actions are not described; the horrors and absurdity, inhumanity of war are shown through the lyrical hero’s attitude towards it. The word “deserter” usually evokes hostility; it is almost a traitor) Why does the hero almost proudly say about himself: “I showed another courage - I was the first deserter in the country”?)
- Why does the hero return from the war without permission? (Fighting “for someone else’s interest”, shooting at another person, at a “brother” is not heroism. Losing human appearance: “The war has eaten away my whole soul” is not heroism. Being a toy in the war while “merchants know "They live quietly in the rear, and "scoundrels and parasites" drive people to the front to die - this is also not heroism. In this situation, courage was really what the lyrical hero did, he deserted. He returns from the war in the summer of 1917.)
STUDENT MESSAGE,
- One of the main themes of the poem is the condemnation of the imperialist and fratricidal civil war. Things are bad in the village at this time:
We are now uneasy.
Everything bloomed with perspiration.
Solid peasant wars -
They fight village to village.
These peasant wars are symbolic. They are the prototype of a great fratricidal war, a national tragedy, from which, according to the miller’s wife, Race almost “disappeared.” The war is also condemned by the author himself, who is not afraid to call himself “the first deserter in the country.” Refusal to participate in a bloody massacre is not a pose, but a deep, hard-won conviction.
CONCLUSIONS. RECORDING THESIS. (slide 10)
THE THEME OF THE PEASANTRY.
- How does the lyrical hero see the past??(Three years have passed since the hero left his native place, and many things seem distant and changed to him. He looks with different eyes: “So dear to my flashing glances is the aged hedge,” “the overgrown garden,” the lilac. These lovely signs recreate the image of “ girls in a white cape" and evoke a bitter thought:
We all loved during these years,
But they loved us little.)
This is where the leading motive of the poem begins.
-What are the moods of the poet’s fellow countrymen?(People are alarmed by the events that have reached their villages: “Total peasant wars,” and the reason is “anarchy. They drove out the king...” We learn about the “boulder, brawler, rude” Pron Ogloblin, an embittered drunkard, the murderer of the headman. It turns out that that “Now there are thousands of them/I hate to create in freedom.” And as a terrible result: “Race is gone, gone../Nurse Rus died.)
-What questions worry men? ( Firstly, this is the eternal question about land: “Say: / Will the arable land of the masters go to the peasants / Without ransom?” The second question is about the war: “Why then at the front / Are we destroying ourselves and others?” Third question: “Tell me/Who is Lenin?”
-Why does the hero answer: “He is you”? (This aphorism about Lenin, the people’s leader, is significant. Here the hero rises to true historicism in showing revolutionary events. Peasant workers, especially the rural poor, warmly welcome Soviet power and follow Lenin, because they heard that he is fighting for , in order to forever free the peasants from the oppression of the landowners and give them “the arable land of the masters without ransom”).
-What prompted the hero to turn to Lenin? (Vera, maybe more precisely - desire to believe in a bright future)
-What kind of peasants appear before us?(Pron is a Russian traditional rebel, the embodiment Pugachev's beginning. Labutya, his brother, is an opportunist and a parasite.)
-Is there a positive type of peasant in the poem? (Of course there is. This miller is the embodiment of kindness, humanity, closeness to nature. All this makes the miller one of the main characters of the poem.)
MESSAGE.
- The fate of the main characters of the poem is closely connected with revolutionary events: the landowner Anna Snegina, whose entire farm was taken by the peasants during the revolution; the poor peasant Ogloblin Pron, fighting for the power of the Soviets; an old miller and his wife; the narrator of the poet, involved in “peasant affairs” by the revolutionary storm. Yesenin's attitude towards his heroes is imbued with concern for their destinies. Unlike his first works, which glorify the transformed peasant Rus' as a single whole, in Anna Snegina he does not idealize the Russian peasantry.
MESSAGE.
Yesenin foresees the tragedy of the peasantry of 1929-1933, observing and experiencing the origins of this tragedy. Yesenin is worried that the Russian peasant is ceasing to be the owner and worker of his land, that he is looking for an easy life, striving for profit at any cost. For Yesenin, the main thing is the moral qualities of people. Revolutionary freedom poisoned the village peasants with permissiveness and awakened moral vices in them.
CONCLUSIONS. RECORDING THESIS. (slide 11)
-Now let’s turn to our heroes and see how the leading motive of the poem develops.
LEITMOTHIO OF THE POEM (“WE ALL LOVED DURING THESE YEARS...”)
- How are the feelings of the characters, Anna and Sergei, shown when they meet? (The dialogue of the heroes takes place on two levels: obvious and implicit (chapter 3). There is an ordinary polite conversation between people who are almost strangers to each other. But individual remarks and gestures show that the feelings of the heroes are alive.(READ) ).
The leitmotif of the poem already sounds optimistic. (“There is something beautiful in summer, / And with summer there is something beautiful in us”)
-What is the reason for the discord in the relationships of the heroes?(Pron Ogloblin planned to take away the Snegin’s lands, and for negotiations he took an “important” person, as he considered, a resident of the capital. They arrived at the wrong time: it turned out that news had just arrived about the death of Anna’s husband. In grief, she accuses Sergei: “You are a pathetic and low coward./He died.../And you are here...” The heroes haven’t seen each other all summer).
MESSAGE.
The poem “Anna Snegina” is lyric-epic. Her main topic- personal, but epic events are revealed through the fate of the heroes. The name itself suggests that Anna is the central image of the poem. The name of the heroine sounds particularly poetic and polysemantic. This name has full sonority, beauty of alliteration, richness of associations. Snegina is a symbol of the purity of white snow, echoes the spring color of bird cherry, this name is a symbol of lost youth. Associations arise with Yesenin’s images: a girl in white, a thin birch tree, a snowy bird cherry tree.
The lyrical plot of the poem - the story of the failed love of the heroes - is barely outlined; it develops as a series of fragments. The failed romance of the heroes takes place against the backdrop of a bloody and uncompromising class war. The characters' relationships are romantic, unclear, and feelings are intuitive. The revolution led the heroes to parting, the heroine ended up in exile - in England, from where she writes a letter to the hero of the poem. The heroes of the revolution do not have memories of love. The fact that Anna found herself far from Soviet Russia is a sad pattern, a tragedy for many Russian people of that time. And Yesenin’s merit is that he was the first to show this.
-How is the new government portrayed in the poem?
(October 1917, the hero meets in the village. He learns about the coup from Pron, who “almost died of joy”, “Now we all have kvass! / Without any ransom from the summer / We take arable land and forests.” Pron’s dream to take away the land from the Snegins came true, supported by the new government: “In Russia there are now Soviets / And Lenin is the senior commissar." Soviet power is portrayed ironically, even sarcastically. The first slackers and drunkards climbed into power, like Pron Labuti’s brother, who is “a boastful and diabolical a coward,” “People like that are always on the radar./They don’t live as calluses on their hands./And here he is, of course, on the Council”).
- What events take place before the hero’s next arrival to his native place? (6 years pass: “Severe, formidable years!” The goods taken from the landowners did not bring happiness to the peasants: why did the “grimy rabble” need “grand pianos” and “gramophone” to play “Tambov foxtrot for the cows”? “The grain grower's destiny was extinguished »).
-How does the hero know about the events in Kriush?(He learns about the events from the miller’s letter: Pron was shot by Denikov’s men, Labutya escaped - “he crawled into the straw,” and then cried for a long time: “I should wear a red order / for my bravery,” and now Civil War subsided, “the storm calmed down”).
-And again our hero is in the village. What impression did Anna’s letter make on him? (The hero receives a letter with the “London seal”. In the letter there is no word of reproach, no complaint, no regret about the lost property, only bright nostalgia.READ .Sergei remains cold and almost cynical as before: “A letter is like a letter./For no reason. /For the life of me I wouldn’t write something like that.”)
-How does the leitmotif of the poem change in its final part? (Here a “secondary plan” appears, a deep one. The hero seems not to be affected by the letter, as if he is doing everything as before, but everything seems different to him.READ. What changed? “In the old way” was replaced by “as before”, the “aged” fence became “hunched over”.)
MESSAGE.
The poet - the hero of the poem - constantly emphasizes that his soul is already in many ways closed to the best feelings and wonderful impulses: “Nothing got into my soul, / Nothing confused me.” And only in the finale a chord sounds - a memory of the most beautiful and forever, forever lost. Separation from Anna in the lyrical context of the poem is separation from youth, separation from the purest and most holy thing that happens to a person at the dawn of life. But - the main thing in the poem - everything human that is beautiful, bright and holy lives in the hero, remains with him forever as a memory, as a “living life”:
I'm walking through an overgrown garden,
The face is touched by lilac.
So sweet to my flashing glances
A hunched fence.
Once upon a time at that gate over there
I was sixteen years old
She told me affectionately: “No!”
They were distant and dear!..
That image has not faded away in me.
We all loved during these years,
But that means
They loved us too.
RECORDING THE LEITMOTHIO DEVELOPMENT SCHEME (slide 12)
VII. Final word teachers. Return to the epigraph.
- “Distant. sweet images made the soul rejuvenate, but also regretted what was gone forever. At the end of the poem, only one word has changed, but the meaning has changed significantly. Nature, homeland, spring, love - these words are of the same order. And the person who forgives is right. (Reading the epigraph)
VIII. Lesson summary and homework.
